If a public employee, elected or career, has a net worth that can’t be explained
What was the net worth of the public official when he/she entered public service compared to his/her net worth now or when they left public service? President Harry S. Truman gave us the only performance review we needed about 75 years ago. Why haven’t we used it before now?
If a public employee, elected or career, has a net worth that can’t be explained beyond what would be expected by his government salary, we have one of Truman’s crooks. These elected crooks are beholden to someone other than the voters that hired them. The unelected career government crooks are beholden to someone other than their agency and are not complying with their oath of office.
The high visibility crooks we already recognize who would fail this performance review, include the Clintons, the Obamas, the Bidens, and that 29-year-old former bartender from New York, just to name a few. Unfortunately, there are many more members of the uniparty political machine, both Republican and Democrat, who would fail this performance review spectacularly. I fear that the failure rate would include a majority of elected officials from city council members, mayors, state legislators, governors, congress people, to presidents. I would also include most political appointees and many in the staffs of all of the above.
Too much of government is only eye wash. They keep trying to make We the People think they are doing things, yet the only thing they really do well is spend money the American government doesn’t have and make suckers out of We the People as they take more and more of our money by taxing us to death.
So now you know that the only performance review that matters is the before and after net worth evaluation. Don’t be shocked by how few will pass this litmus test.
"The last official act of any government is to loot the treasury." ~ George Washington