The question that should have been asked that Feinstein should have been forced to face was not why she sat on the letter but what she thought Ford wanted her to do with the letter
The Question Proving Feinstein's Deceitful Delay Tactic That Was Never Asked
At the heart of the national disgrace confirmation hearing that took place last week was senior United States Senator from California, Dianne Feinstein who was the only member of The Senate Judiciary Committee to receive Christine Blasey Ford's accusation letter on July 30th of 2018. Doing nothing with Ford's serious allegations letter for six weeks, Feinstein blasted Republican committee members for not asking for an FBI investigation. Although it was Feinstein who failed to inform her fellow Senators of the privy accusations until right before the Kavanaugh vote and it was Feinstein who assisted Ford in obtaining the radical leftist lawyer Debra Katz without ever telling Kavanaugh in her one-on-one meeting or her colleagues, the leftist media painted Republicans as hiding the truth.
The fact that Feinstein buried the letter for all that time is not in dispute. What is in dispute is the reason as to why she did nothing with Ford's allegation letter. In her opening statement, Ford hit upon this point by saying, "My hope was that providing the information confidentially would be sufficient to allow the Senate to consider Mr. Kavanaugh’s serious misconduct without having to make myself, my family, or anyone’s family vulnerable to the personal attacks..."
When questioned by Republican Senators, Feinstein has stated that she did nothing with the letter for all that time because she was respecting Ford's desire for the letter to remain confidential. Unfortunately, Republican Senators accepted that non-answer and thus never exposed the real reason which could have been accomplished with one simple question,
Feinstein's answer doesn't make sense because it only described the condition Ford had made in handing over the letter, not the purpose or her intent of handing over the letter to her. Feinstein never had to acknowledge that she denied Ford's wishes which were to have the contents of her letter known to all committee members before voting to move the vote to the Senate floor. How else could the Senate Judiciary Committee respect Ford's wishes to consider Kavanaugh's behavior if they never saw Ford's allegations in her letter?
The question that should have been asked that Feinstein should have been forced to face was not why she sat on the letter but what she thought Ford wanted her to do with the letter. The distinction between Ford's stated intent and her stipulated condition to Feinstein is massive and reveals not only how Ford's desire to bring an allegation privately to U.S. Senators turned into a very public circus but exposes the fact that Feinstein's goal had always been to delay bringing Ford's allegations to the Senate.
As far as Feinstein and the Left were concerned, Ford was mere collateral damage in their greater struggle to undermine American values
To produce maximum damage to Kavanaugh's Supreme Court chances Feinstein knew a public spectacle had to be initiated, hence the mysterious leak forcing Ford to expose her identity. A brilliant, albeit evil tactic on the part of Feinstein and the other soulless Democrats.
Feinstein and the rest of the swamp gang of so-called champions of women's rights took a woman who appeared extraordinarily vulnerable and used her for their political advantage; compounding her troubles from one assault with another. But as far as Feinstein and the Left were concerned, Ford was mere collateral damage in their greater struggle to undermine American values. Unfortunately for Kavanaugh he represented the fifth vote and had to be destroyed. Had the tables been reversed and recently confirmed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch was the fifth vote, there would be no doubt that unsubstantiated and uncorroborated allegations would have been levied against him.
Feinstein seemed angry when she had to deny if she or her staff leaked Ford's letter to the press. One has to wonder what her response would be if she was asked by fellow Senators to prove the legitimacy of her denial. In an ironic twist, she would be facing the same impossible task she and her Democratic swamp colleagues were demanding of Kavanaugh.
Rick Hayes lives in the epicenter of liberal land where reality and truth will never encounter a welcome mat.
An award-winning writer and photographer, with over twenty years of professional experience in both fields, Hayes started his journalism adventure after a successful, eye-opening career as a Banker in Wall Street. Although he spent his early work life surrounded by custom made shirts, expensive ties and the shiniest of shoes, Hayes was an accomplished singer, cutting a few records with a local band and appearing on one of the first cable shows.
Working for a weekly New York paper, in one of the most politically corrupt areas in the State, he began investing his time trying to understand the nature of corruption.
