The Shadow Conspirators Who Undermined the Republic

Nearly one month ago, there was a lengthy piece in Time Magazine that required a serious response in order to help "normal people" make some sense of what was being written beneath the surface or between the lines of propaganda. I offered my viewpoint, but there was way too much embedded in Molly Ball's article to ignore. I recommended that the article be read despite her annoying, self-congratulatory tone and the attempt at the ideological brainwashing of naive readers. The article titled, "The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election" should be read by people who love the Republic to become acquainted with how contorted and inverted such people's conception of justice in this nation has become. However, her article reveals more.

"The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign…"

"The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign…" serves more than a simple roadmap of how people who hated President Trump worked within the shadows (certainly the left- leaning mainstream media would not have called attention to the covert effort to fully undermine election integrity. The writers hired by the elitist media moguls work for pay to misrepresent the truth at best, and at their worst to promulgate propaganda to the masses. They are the enemy of the people despite what Wolf Blitzer, or the other media mouthpieces would like to tell themselves. Molly Ball is one of them who must believe in the cause she touts in the article. Her article reveals some in the inner media circles had the knowledge of what was going on "in the shadows."   It is safe to assume that if Ball knew what was transpiring, there were some within the inner circles of the media moguls who knew and condoned the nefarious activities. Ball was paid for her glowing account. According to what citizens were expected to believe:

The scenario the shadow campaigners were desperate to stop was not a Trump victory. It was an election so calamitous that no result  could be discerned at all, a failure of the central act of democratic self-governance that has been a hallmark of America since its founding.

Such an account is actually an account of a network of conspirators on the left who did want to stop a Trump victory and an account of how they plotted to undermine a federal election -- one way or another. Those were the words of Nancy Pelosi as she made the public threat that Donald Trump would not be POTUS "One Way or Another.' It may have been for the best that the election was stolen, otherwise one would hate to dwell on what the ‘other' method of removing the president from office may have been. U.S. history demonstrates that the Democrats made good on a plot to deal with President Trump, "One Way or Another". The anniversary of that dark episode is just one month away.

---

The criminals who stole the election benefited by being elected via fraud or electronic vote tabulation manipulation

Despite the propagandist point that the conspirators did not aim at Trump, the Democrat Party leadership had been aiming to get Trump out of office "one way or another" since before he even took office. The reality is well documented by their own attempts time and again to rid the United States of the scourge of Donald Trump and his band of dastardly "deplorables" any way possible. This reality was also demonstrated by two other documented efforts: 1) the farcical impeachment of a private citizen, and 2) the concerted focus on marginalizing Trump supporters. The evidence of this is sourced from those on the Left as well as those in the Never Trumper camps. These are the two broad groupings that Ball referenced as working together for the sake of preventing the "failure of the central act of democratic self-governance that has been a hallmark of America since its founding."        That is precisely what the conspirators orchestrated: a failure of the sacred right of a free people to have their voices heard in a fair and honest election. Ball's attempt at whitewashing the theft of a federal election, and all the leaders of both political parties accepting the results of a stolen election should give everyone pause to consider whether the United States is still a Constitutional Republic, or whether it is not. Either the public has been lied to by the mainstream media, by ‘journalists' like Ball and her comrades, or the public has been lied to by the alternative media sources who have revealed alleged fraud in several ways.  Yet, assuming the worst, and truth exists,  it is not what people want to know, the more relevant question is: Who are the ones who benefitted from such an outcome? It is not hard to connect the dots. The criminals who stole the election benefited by being elected via fraud or electronic vote tabulation manipulation. Their accomplices in the media are attempting to justify it. Those who were labeled "conservatives," which translates to "Republicans," or translates to Never Trumpers, who were part of the conspiracy, are also complicit with undermining the sacred right of a fair and honest election. And, the criminals who were elected are swiftly working to undermine all future elections by passing HR1.

---

Support Canada Free Press

---

One question regarding the AFL-CIO is how long have they been tampering with elections?

Yet, Ball's "Secret History of the Shadow Campaign…" reveals more specifics about the conspirators. Molly Ball admits that "much of this activity took place on the left…" On the surface, the primary organizer, or "architect" of the conspiracy was Mike Podhorzer, the senior adviser to the president of the AFL-CIO, now the largest union federation in the U.S. It is ironic that AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka criticized Joe Biden's actions on his first day in office to cancel the Keystone XL pipeline. But, one should assume that Trumka was behind the conspiracy if his senior advisor was the shadow "architect" of the theft of the election. Trumka's well-documented ‘criticism,' was anemic and amounted to a weak attempt to appear he was standing up for the workers who lost their jobs. Trumka went so far as to reveal the consistency of his conspiracy as he defended Biden saying that "he believes Biden regrets his handling of the executive order." Biden may still not even know he signed such an executive order. One question regarding the AFL-CIO is how long have they been tampering with elections? It is understandable that a chief advisor like Podhorzer would have been trusted with such a mission. Big Labor has been organizing to influence elections legally as well as illegally for a number of years. Additionally, labor unions in general have had socialist ties dating back to the early 1900s. Who else would gain by a conspiracy to undermine a national election? The Socialists. Who else participated in this conspiracy to steal the election besides the unions? The Socialists. Maurice Mitchell, who is the national director of the "Working Families Party" was quoted in Ball's article as praising Podhorzer: "Pod played a critical behind-the-scenes role in keeping different pieces of the movement infrastructure in communication and aligned."

---

Whose socialist-laden legacy was being threatened by Trump?

The "Working Families Party" was created by Daniel Cantor, a former staffer for Jesse Jackson's 1988 presidential campaign. But, before he founded a more ‘sanitized' aspect of a Marxist political party, he founded the Marxist-driven "New Party" in 1992. Their objective was to get leftist or socialist candidates elected to public office in as many states as possible. Their hope was to push the "Democratic" Party much further to the left, with the ultimate goal of establishing a Marxist party platform. This was an attempt to create an umbrella under which disparate and disenfranchised Marxist groups could collectively gain political power. It was somewhat successful in initially attracting many members from the Democratic Socialists of America and ACORN. One of their most famous members was Barack Obama, whom the New Party helped to elect to the Illinois Senate in 1996.  Whose socialist-laden legacy was being threatened by Trump? If readers have been connecting the dots, clever patriots may now have a much more clear picture of the chief conspirator. The puppet-master-in-chief lurking in the shadows may still be "leading from behind." The question again: Is the United States still a Constitutional Republic?