Once to every man and nation comes the moment to decide. This is ours
David Robb , Bio and Archives--October 14, 2024
American Politics, News | Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

Here we are, just about three weeks from the most significant election in US history since at least the Civil War, and perhaps ever. Despite heroic efforts prompted by the questions regarding election integrity that were raised in the 2020 election, few effective changes to our election systems have been made. I have written of some of these issues here and in previous articles.
We still have widespread mass absentee voting and even universal vote by mail in eight states. We still use highly compromised electronic voter registration systems that have been shown to contain vast numbers of non-citizens, duplicate registrations, registrations for voters who moved away, voters registered at improper addresses, and numerous other problems—yet these same voter rolls will be used to determine who can vote, whose vote will count, and whose vote will be rejected.
We still have widespread use of ballot drop boxes where fraudulent ballots can be deposited and are guaranteed to be counted because there are no effective checks to prevent fraud. Even the much cited signature checking ritual has been demonstrated to be incapable of detecting and blocking acceptance of fraudulent ballots.
We still use the machines that malfunction or can be manipulated to produce fraudulent counts, improper results, and unreliable records of our elections and of the ballots cast.
We have our own government encouraging registration of non-citizens by providing voter registration forms along with forms to request financial or medical assistance to anyone who requests such aid—including everyone who is in our country illegally.
The armies of Deceit have been mobilized in support of the Democracy and the Deep State. Through the propaganda efforts of a captive mass media, people are being prepared to accept that the election could be won by a candidate who is incapable of providing coherent answers to questions of significance, who claims she will fix problems that she hasn't fixed in over three years, despite having full power and responsibility, and who claims to support positions that contradict her positions and actions of the past several years.
Through the valiant efforts of citizen groups across the country, an awareness of the problems with our election systems and of the efforts that we can expect will be taken to corrupt election results has been raised. Poll watchers, observers, analysts, auditors and other teams have been organized to monitor election processes for signs of manipulation and fraud. Will they be enough? The enemies of freedom are clever and have great power. They jealously guard that power and will do all that they can to keep it.
If the measures we take to ensure an honest election are inadequate, and enough bogus ballots are counted to ensure a 'win' for the Deep State selection, we can expect the media to point out how the polls predicted it, and our candidate lost fairly. After all, their candidate got 103 million votes to Trump's miniscule 96 million votes.
The fact that there are only about 170 million legal voters in the country only means that all those Trump voters who were claiming there would be fraud in the election must have introduced 30 million fraudulent votes to try to get their candidate to win.
Just as we saw in the US in 2020, in Venezuela, in Brazil, and even in Germany and the UK recently, it is the fact that there was a general election that is significant. Any result is sacred and cannot be challenged. It doesn't matter if there was obvious fraud, once the ballots are cast and the results certified, the legitimacy of the outcome is beyond question—by definition and "law".
Courts will not accept challenges because the requirements for evidence and for an identified perpetrator don't exist. The universal secret ballot system means that once ballots are commingled, it is impossible to identify a fraudulent ballot and distinguish it from a legitimate one. Further, the ability to associate a fraudulent ballot with someone who prepared it is also lost. No evidence, no case.
There is a reason why Trump has frequently been asked if he will accept the results of the election, regardless of the outcome. Note that no Democrat candidate has been asked that question. Fraud is just a tool the Deep State uses to get their way, so in their mind there is no legitimate objection to its use. "If you are too stupid to cheat, then you don't deserve to win."
All this leaves us in a difficult situation. Regardless of how the election goes, there will be mass disagreement with the results.
As of right now, if the Democrat candidate is selected, few will accept the selection as legitimate. Too many indicators exist that the candidate is incompetent and has too little real support to win. A well-documented history of election manipulation and corruption by the Deep State Democrat party provides evidence of motive and opportunity for crime. Acceptance of the election results would strain credibility.
In such an outcome, though, the full power of the state would be arrayed against any who would object. The Attorney General has already said that he will pursue any who contest the results, and the past actions of the FBI and other law enforcement agencies against the J6 defendants shows the seriousness of their intentions to preserve their power. Still, there could be sufficient dissatisfaction with the results that large-scale resistance would result, possibly even to the level of Civil War.
On the other hand, should the provisions taken against fraud and the volume of votes prove sufficient to overcome the efforts of those who would select our leaders, to the point where Donald Trump was elected, we could expect a different sort of situation.
If Trump is elected, then the Deep State Left and its fellow travelers would explode. Violent demonstrations would punctuate media propaganda outcry claiming that the election was stolen. They would use all the information that has been discovered and published about prior election fraud as proof that the Right had been planning to steal the election.
The Left is adroit at accusing their opposition of doing that which they do themselves. The Left is highly prone to using violence and terrorist style intimidation to get their way.
From the time the election results were certified until Inauguration Day, the Left would launch massive lawfare attacks to challenge the results. The Attorney General and other agencies, rather than opposing the challenges, would support them, since it would be their power being threatened. Again, the threat of Civil War would exist.
To add to the threat, we must remember that even if Trump wins, the Left will still have almost three months left of the current administration. This lame-duck administration, with no incentive to restraint, would have ample time to introduce executive actions, pass laws, spend money, legalize criminal aliens, and even declare war and martial law, and suspend the Constitution indefinitely. Only some of these acts would be possible to reverse quickly. Most would require considerable time and effort to fix, even were a fix possible. In a burst of schadenfreude—the joy of destruction—the Left could wreak enormous harm. "If we can't have it, then neither will you."
No true American would take such actions, but then, the Left has amply demonstrated their hostility to America. The America of history, the America we have known and loved for years, stands in the way of the Socialist dystopia they desire. Our America must be destroyed.
It is up to us—to each of us— to stand in defense. Shall we throw away the sacrifices of previous generations and let liberty and justice perish throughout this land, or shall we show ourselves the rightful heirs of what has been given us to preserve the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity?
Once to every man and nation comes the moment to decide. This is ours.
View Comments
David Robb is a practicing scientist and CTO of a small firm developing new security technologies for detection of drugs and other contraband. Dave has published extensively in TheBlueStateConservative, and occasionally in American Thinker.