Tolerance and Coherence Are Foreign Words to Liberals

I have begun by showing how conservatives feel for our blessed country to point out that this collection of individuals, whether registered members of the tea party organization or just believers in the basic ideals that this country has represented for more than two centuries are the true patriots. Those dissenting voices of communists, socialists, Islamists, Muslims and others with differing views are not, and never can be called 'true patriots'.

For starters, just absorb these words written online by the aforementioned Ralph E. Wall on August 7, 2012: "This is a new America. It is not the country I was born in. It is not the country it was four years ago. Almost none of the currently accepted principles of life, mores, or ethics, are the ones that built the country. This is tragic.

"This once great nation that had its roots firmly embedded in a biblical worldview is now rejecting the same at all levels. In order to enjoy the full benefits and respect of being an American, people must now not tolerate, but embrace, evil. They must openly accept homosexuality, abortion, pornography, and blasphemy. It's "un-American" to do otherwise. You will suffer in some form if you don't raise your PC quotient. From God's point of view to succumb to this cultural pressure is sin. "Not only does our society think we should embrace the bad (pronounced "evil") things, we must also not verbalize support for anything traditional. This includes marriage between a man and a woman, heterosexual lifestyle, not killing our babies, and holding off on sex until married (Now that's a prehistoric idea). "It's pretty scary to think that Dan Cathy, CEO of Chick-fil-A fell under vicious attack simply because he believes the Bible and God's definition of marriage. He basically stated that he feared for America, that we deserved God's judgment, and that he supported traditional marriage. "Dan Cathy has stirred the pot, even though I don't think that was on his mind at all when he made his comments. People on all sides of the issues are now heavily engaged in this war of the worldviews and this is a good thing. At least people are getting involved, but it can explode into violence or chaos. This would not be good for anyone." I don't necessarily agree with people who 'use' their kids for political purposes. It's their right to teach them what they want them to believe in. But it just doesn't seem proper to drag them into the sleazy world of politics. Had they done this years ago when even a lot of Democrats were at least good American citizens who believed in and strongly supported our Constitution and our laws. But over the years evil minds have taken control of the Democratic Party who want that party, and everyone else for that matter, to accept communistic socialism into our lives. These people, originally called 'liberals' and becoming known more recently as 'progressives' have but one mission and that is to destroy America as we have known it for 236 years and succumb to the corruptness of the socialistic 'One World'ers' with their home base in the United Nations - audaciously right here in America. An example of what I have just said can be found in a column titled, "Liberals Call for Killing of 6-year-old Conservative" published online at The Patriot Update on August 2, 2012. As stated above, I don't necessarily agree with placing children in the sleaze of world politics, but it's their right if they so choose. It is NOT right for anyone to call for the deaths of these kids who espouse political views. Even a colossal fool should understand that the kids are merely parroting what their parents coached them to say. Show me a six-year-old kid who reads political journals, whether online or in newsprint, and then mouths his reasons of why voters should avoid certain candidates for elected office, and I'll show you an old person in children's clothing. But the online responses, obviously from demented liberal Democrats, are reprehensibly full of calls for the demise of the child. Is that rational? Is it the normal reaction from a liberal? Answers: 'NO' for the first question; and 'YES' for the second question.

"Shoot the kid! Kill the parents!!! TRXOne" "can someone kill that child. to teach the parents a lesson!!! Almdeald4life" "This child and his parents need to be euthanized. Unreadable sign" "If I could I'd kill this kid. He's somewhat racist and brings up Obama stereotypes. Dumb redneck. MonkeyOnFire Red"

These were just a sampling of the comments; certainly indicative of the lack of any coherence coming from the liberal responders.