Trump: Hey, this ‘first 100 days’ obsession is pretty ridiculous, isn’t it?

By —— Bio and Archives--April 21, 2017

American Politics, News, Opinion | Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

I have a theory there’s some projection going on inside the Beltway. The hot talk at the moment is that Trump is pushing hard for the House to pass ObamaCare repeal/replace by the end of next week so he can claim a major legislative victory in his first 100 days in office.

Two possibilities:

  1. It’s true, because Trump doesn’t want the media launching into high-and-mighty analysis of what he accomplished during that completely arbitrary period.
  2. The media simply assume Trump must be thinking about this because they never stop talking about it. It’s one of those self-fulfilling prophecies, theoretically anyway: He knows we’ll pound him if he doesn’t pass it in the first 100 days, so he’s obsessed with doing that very thing.

In which case, the “first 100 days” thing is hardly the point so much as the realization that you’re going to have to deal with yet another round of media he-hasn’t-been-productive blather, regardless of what prompts them to say it.

Trump himself has noticed how ridiculous both ends of the phenomenon are:



Trump is correct, of course, that the “first 100 days” standard is absurd. It’s an arbitrary round number that means not a thing. If you pass good legislation or make a good decision that helps the country, it doesn’t matter if you make it on Day 1, Day 99, Day 150 or day 1,000. As long as you make it. There are things such as budget cycles and election cycles that affect when it’s plausible to do such things, but that doesn’t make the 100-day thing legitimate.

Historically, the 100-day obsession appears to date back to FDR and the New Deal. Given massive Democratic majorities in the midst of the Great Depression, FDR chose to use the first 100 days as a timetable for passing major legislation. It made for a narrative of decisive action at a time when the nation was desperate for something to change the status quo. Of course, the things FDR did in his first 100 days are largely responsible for establishing the big-government apparatus and welfare state we’re still grappling with to this day, but in 1933 all anyone cared about was that the president was moving aggressively and getting things done.

Why that means every president since then should be assessed by the 100-day threshold . . . beats me. It’s just one of those dopey media narratives that is now established and won’t go away as long as they want to keep it alive.

Then again, Trump didn’t mind the 100-day thing back in October.

Continued below...

Please SHARE this story as the only way for CFP to beat Facebook anti-Conservative Suppression.

Only YOU can save CFP from Social Media Suppression. Tweet, Post, Forward, Subscribe or Bookmark us

Dan Calabrese -- Bio and Archives | Comments

Dan Calabrese’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain.com

A new edition of Dan’s book “Powers and Principalities” is now available in hard copy and e-book editions. Follow all of Dan’s work, including his series of Christian spiritual warfare novels, by liking his page on Facebook.

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.
-- Follow these instructions on registering: