Trump says he will leave his entire business enterprise 'in total'

Wall Street Journal has called on Trump to liquidate his interest in the business empire entirely

No less than the Wall Street Journal has called on Trump to liquidate his interest in the business empire entirely. If he doesn't - and I'm sure he realizes this - he creates endless opportunities for his political opponents to try to pin scandals on him. The mere fact that the federal government is a tenant in Trump Tower provides an obvious conflict of interest - one Trump could probably have managed in the abstract. But when there thousands of them that have the potential to pop up every day, how do you ever get the opportunity to focus on governing? As to the details, the fact that his children are going to be involved with the press conference suggests to me that Trump is not simply selling everything off to the highest bidder. He may be selling it to them (assuming they could come up with the money), but it sounds more likely that he's stepping away and putting everything in some sort of blind trust. Yet it wouldn't be a totally blind trust if his children are involved in the management of it, especially since it's clear they will be important advisors in his administration, as will his son-in-law Jared Kushner. Anyway, here's the principle this establishes that I really don't like. We've never before had a pure businessman/non-politician elected president, and because it has now happened for the first time people are screaming about all the horrible conflicts of interest because Trump has profit-earning interests that could butt up against the interests of the federal government or, theoretically, the nation. I get that.

I don't like the precedent that people from the private sector are inherently tinged with conflict, whereas career politicians who accept money from special interests all the time are in the clear

But do these people think career politicians have no similar conflicts? What about Democrats who rely heavily on public employee unions for campaign cash? What about Republicans who rely heavily on chambers of commerce and other established business interests for campaign cash? Why does Trump have to divest himself of every real or perceived conflict of interest in the private sector, but these people can keep accepting cash from their benefactors while pushing policies that benefit said benefactors? These conflicts are just as serious, if not more so, than Trump's. But we've lived with them for as long as anyone can remember and we're all used to it by now, so it's no big deal. But Trump's conflicts are the end of the world and he has to sell everything? I don't like the precedent that people from the private sector are inherently tinged with conflict, whereas career politicians who accept money from special interests all the time are in the clear. Trump may be able to divest himself or otherwise step away from his business to focus on the presidency, but I don't see why everyone from the business world should necessarily have to do so. Yet this is going to set the precedent that they must, thus discouraging their interest in seeking office, while professional politicians will keep doing what they've always done. That's a crock, however much Trump's decision is probably beneficial both to him and to the country in the short term. Someone needs to tell the political class that making money in the private sector is not a scandal.