After the cowardice shown during the eight years of his predecessor, Barack Obama, the truth needed to be communicated to these people at the UN.
In his initial speech to the UN in 2009, President Obama
maligned the U.S., under the prior president, George W. Bush, by claiming that the U.S. had “tortured” detainees imprisoned in Guantanamo Bay during the War on Terror. Contrary to this
canard, repeated endlessly by both President Obama and the mainstream media, the U.S. did not torture the terrorists/Islamist fighters in Guantanamo (or in any other prison) it captured. In fact, we know what torture is, as it is
defined in the U.S. Code, and if it did occur, then the detainees should have been able to prove it in a court of law (since the Supreme Court
unconstitutionally gave them the ability to appeal to U.S. courts). But they didn’t, and couldn’t, because the worst thing that happened to any detainees – the waterboarding of the three terrorists – is not really torture. Unless the courts want to admit that the U.S.
has been torturing thousands of American soldiers during their training for countless years.
In his speech to the UN in 2012, President Obama got a lot of attention for his shameless lie that an obscure video had instigated the murder of the U.S. ambassador to Libya, and three other Americans, when in reality it was an organized al-Qaeda attack. Less attention, however, was paid to his weak defense of free speech, which
included the statement that “[t]he future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” Rather than pandering to the radical Muslim delegates with this statement, Obama should have simply told them that Muslim society would have to learn to tolerate videos that might insult the prophet of Islam, or its tenets, like every other religion tolerates insults to their own prophets or tenets (some of which have come from the world’s Muslims).