Vox.com is probably best known for its excellent, hard-hitting, retractions. Over the years, the masterful way they "Voxsplain" their incorrect reporting and terrible conclusions has become something of an art form. Still, they're a standard-bearing rag for the left and they represent the views of the average Democrat fairly well.
So what does it say about them that one of their editors is actually advising people to riot when Trump comes to their town?
Meet mental giant Emmett Rensin. He's a Vox.com editor and columnist who thinks it's time to stop Trump supporters through any means necessary, short of murder.
Lest you think Rensin is joking, he decided to quickly dispel the notion. Then he began outlining exactly how far you should go. According to Vox's best and brightest, shouting down is great, property destruction is fine, and a little violence is perfectly acceptable. Just try not to , y'know, kill anyone.
And that's the left in a nutshell. They talk a big game about peaceful "hope and change" but, really, everything is on the table. Deep down, they're ready, willing, and even eager to dive into the violence that they always accuse others of embracing. While Rensin won't admit it, we doubt he'd squawk much if someone actually
did die in his little battle.
Why? Because Trump is a fascist. Cue the irony:
If Rensin was a little brighter, he'd realize that advocating Gestapo tactics to silence a non-violent political opponent - and then calling that opponent a fascist - is probably the least tenable argument he could possibly make.
Since this is the mentality of the progressive movement, we assume Vox will not take any action against their violence-advocating editor. We anxiously await their efforts to "Voxsplain" that decision.
We'll leave you with one final thought from Mr. Rensin: