Modern collectivism seeks not only to reverse what the Founders built, but to counterfeit it
The Founding Fathers also believed in community and standing together, but they understood that true community arises naturally fromfree individuals, not from state‑directed conformity. The delegates of the former English colonies knew they needed to “hang together, or surely hang separately,” as Benjamin Franklin famously put it. And while “We the People” and E pluribus unum (“Out of many, one”) are treasured parts of our national heritage, they are not synonymous with the collectivism promoted by the modern Democratic Party.
As a constitutionalist, I love my community. Working together is both rewarding and essential to the American experience. If a dish is to be prepared properly, a team of chefs must work in harmony, but the success of that dish depends on unity around a proven recipe, not on each chef chasing personal whims. In the same way, a community of sovereign individuals with distinct cultures, churches, trades, opinions, and backgrounds can unite as one republic under the United States Constitution without surrendering their liberty to collectivist ideology.
Unity in America’s foundational system is the product of liberty, not a substitute for it. The Founding Fathers believed in unity by consent, not absorption.
Modern collectivism seeks not only to reverse what the Founders built, but to counterfeit it. Where E pluribus unum means “out of many, one,” their model flips it to ex uno, plures – out of one, many. The progressive wing of the Democratic Party advances a worldview in which central authority defines which identities are acceptable. Individuals cannot simply be individuals; they must be sorted, labeled, and managed.