WhatFinger

Obama Supporters Trash the New Girl on the Block, Democrats look like a bunch of misogynists

What Do The Democrats Have Against Women?


By William Kevin Stoos ——--November 1, 2008

American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us


Do the Democrats fear strong willed women? Does Obama fear them? Why does the party that pretends to be so attuned to women’s rights and equality of the sexes, that pretends to be so open-minded and tolerant of all races, religions, sexual orientations and gender-related issues field the same old tired all-male ticket when there appear to be so many talented, experienced and strong willed women more qualified than Obama himself to lead or second chair the ticket? God only knows.

But the reality is that the Democrat Party cannot seem to field a woman candidate. They prefer instead to nominate another old, boring, middle-aged white male with gray hair—rather than a strong willed woman who was talented enough, smart enough, and attractive enough to garner 18,000,000 votes in the Democratic primaries. Compared to the party of Lincoln, who now fields a war hero and a strong-willed female executive who has actually run things, the Democrats look like a bunch of misogynists. I often wonder if, as a child, Obama was beaten up by a girl on the playground. I cannot explain the deep-seated psychological reason why, but it is clear that he is afraid of girls. What else explains the shabby way in which he treated Hillary Clinton after she won nearly as many votes as he during the primaries—only to learn later that Obama did not give a moment’s thought to picking her as a running mate? Rather than making this very logical choice—one which would have ensured a victory for the Democrats—Obama decided to pick a white male with a lackluster showing during the primaries. Obviously, when Obama talks about “women’s rights,” “equal opportunity for the sexes,” and “breaking the glass ceiling," he was talking in theoretical terms only. His failure to choose a woman as a running mate and his resort to the good ole boy system proves once again that his words are hollow and as phony as the Greek columns which framed his coronation speech. But it was not enough that he dissed Hillary Clinton and the millions of women across the country who worked hard for her campaign and hoped to see the first Democrat woman ascend to the Vice Presidency. His fear of strong willed women in positions of power went even further. Shaken to his tippy toes by the nomination of Sarah Palin as the Republican candidate for the Vice Presidency, and fearful that a Republican woman may ascend to the second highest office in the land, he went one step further: he sent his female minions who, unfazed by his shunning of Hillary, were nevertheless anxious to do his bidding. They spread across the land to criticize and slander Palin, trash her family, and convince the public that Democrats do not really hate strong willed successful women; rather, they just hate strong-willed successful women who are not liberals. The only thing stranger than the dissing of Hillary, is that Hillary—once dissed—is nevertheless anxious to do Obama’s bidding by fanning out across the country along with a group of Obama worshiping Stepford Sisters including Janet Napolitano, Kathleen Sebelius and others for the sole purpose of trying to stem the tide of Sarah Mania which is sweeping across the land. The only thing more curious than a party that shuns strong women and prefers to field an all-male team is that subservient women of that same party are most willing to trash another woman just because Obama commands them. Between Hillary, her Stepford Sisters, and the lap dog press which gets a collective Chris Mathews tingle down their leg whenever they hear Obama speak, the Democrats are pulling all stops to demean, undermine, and defeat the new girl on the block who frankly is more qualified to run things than the good ole boys on the Democrat ticket. Sarah Palin’s only fault is that she is clean cut, intelligent, impressive, kind-hearted, endearing, compassionate, successful, religious, family oriented and (God forbid), unabashedly in love with her husband and children. And, she is one tough lady to boot. They just cannot stand this. It strikes fear into them. When Gloria Steinem—former champion of women’s rights, who once promoted the idea of the successful, intelligent woman who could do whatever she desired to do--comes out of hibernation to trash a woman who typifies everything Steinem used to laud, then you know the Democrats are desperate. There is a new girl on the playground. And they are afraid she will kick their posterior.

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

William Kevin Stoos——

Copyright © 2020 William Kevin Stoos
William Kevin Stoos (aka Hugh Betcha) is a writer, book reviewer, and attorney, whose feature and cover articles have appeared in the Liguorian, Carmelite Digest, Catholic Digest, Catholic Medical Association Ethics Journal, Nature Conservancy Magazine, Liberty Magazine, Social Justice Review, Wall Street Journal Online and other secular and religious publications.  He is a regular contributing author for The Bread of Life Magazine in Canada. His review of Shadow World, by COL. Robert Chandler, propelled that book to best seller status. His book, The Woodcarver (]And Other Stories of Faith and Inspiration) © 2009, William Kevin Stoos (Strategic Publishing Company)—a collection of feature and cover stories on matters of faith—was released in July of 2009. It can be purchased though many internet booksellers including Amazon, Tower, Barnes and Noble and others. Royalties from his writings go to support the Carmelites. He resides in Wynstone, South Dakota.


“His newest book, The Wind and the Spirit (Stories of Faith and Inspiration)” was released in 2011 with all the author’s royalties go to support the Carmelite sisters.”


Sponsored
!-- END RC STICKY -->