Democrat boy wonder casually accused a decent woman of murder
BombThrowers -- BombThrowers, Bio and Archives--June 25, 2017
American Politics, News | Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
Even before I saw the election results Wednesday morning, I knew Republican Karen Handel had won the Georgia special election because the Atlanta Journal-Constitution had other stuff on its front page. “Hawks Trade Dwight Howard to Hornets” ran the headline under the cover picture. “Karen must have won!” I concluded, accurately.
Of course, there were election stories, but none blazoned the hoped-for triumphant photos of middle-aged leftist ladies weeping and hugging each other over their defeat of the terrible woman who would – according to the Ossoff camp – deny them breast cancer treatment. In the last week, Democratic candidate Jon Ossoff pulled off his soft little trust fund independent filmmaker kidskin gloves and began running hate ads trumpeting the lie that Karen Handel wanted women to die of breast cancer because she advised the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation to stop shifting a relatively small portion of its donations to Planned Parenthood around the time Planned Parenthood was caught lying about third-trimester abortions. (The Komen charity was profiled in the February 2012 issue of Organization Trends.)
One Ossoff campaign ad, “Unforgivable,” features “Mindy Fine, MD, OB-GYN, Cobb County, Ga.,” lecturing voters about Handel.
Part of a normal exam is screening for breast and cervical cancer. When we catch it early we save lives. But Karen Handel cut off funding for Planned Parenthood cancer screenings when she was an executive at Susan G. Komen. I don’t usually get involved in politics but as a doctor and a breast cancer survivor myself what Karen Handel did is unforgivable.This was, incidentally, the job Komen hired Handel, a former Georgia secretary of state, to do. Let me be very clear about what Ossoff did with those breast cancer ads: he accused Handel of murdering cancer patients. This sort of false accusation is what pumps up lunatics to shoot congressmen, and Ossoff should be severely called out for stooping to this dangerous sleaze. He probably learned the tactic from his mentor, Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), who conducted a similar hate-incitement campaign years ago when he compared his own constituents to murderous Klansmen if they dared to vote for a moderate white Republican over a black Democrat. In 2007 Congressman Lewis notoriously defamed Lee Morris when it looked like the competent, soft-Republican, socially progressive candidate might defeat one single member of the black left-wing Tammany Hall running Fulton County into the ground at the time. Lewis intoned on black radio: “If you think fighting off dogs and water hoses in the ’60s was bad, imagine if we sit idly by and let the right-wing Republicans take control of the Fulton County Commission … Your very life may depend on it.”
After Essence Johnson attended the local Women’s March, she began to worry that the new wave of feminist activism that Trump had inspired remained too white and too privileged. “John Lewis spoke and that was great, but I drove home through black neighborhoods and poor neighborhoods and saw so many people in poverty, I knew so many women were in shelters. I said, ‘Louise we’ve got to do something!’ I mean we had white women in Range Rovers driving up to do voter outreach at bodegas. It wasn’t going to work.”And in the Nation comment threads, others echoed Walsh’s racist mau-mauing of the people working for Ossoff. This is Democratic politics today:
Ask yourself–why do we even HAVE white women driving up to bodegas in Range Rovers? If I were a poor black woman I sure as hell would not want to see them. I am a poor white gay man, and I don’t want to see them coming round my stoop.After the heady hangover of Tuesday’s election results, Ossoff supporters of all colors should pause to take a hard look at the underbelly of anti-white identity politics and hate-filled, violence-provoking lies their candidate endorsed. No matter how much Ossoff tried to present an image of conciliatory moderation, he was the representative of this politics of economic resentment, false and dangerous accusations about healthcare policy, and toxic identity politics racism. Note that Joan Walsh’s daughter was his deputy field director. And for conservatives, meet your new standard bearer. Long before the young journalists at Live Action and the Center for Medical Progress exposed Planned Parenthood’s failures to protect underage rape victims and their accounting tricks to conceal the profits they were making from the sale of baby parts, Karen Handel stood alone against the organization and paid a heavy price for refusing to submit to the pressure Planned Parenthood was putting on the breast cancer charity for which she worked at the time. In reality, Komen was simply trying to depoliticize its mission of fighting breast cancer by pulling a tiny grant from Planned Parenthood at a time when Planned Parenthood was under fire for multiple misrepresentations of the prevalence and causes of late-term abortions and also its own gross misrepresentation of the number of mammograms they actually provided to women (answer: hardly any). How tiny was the revenue stream? Planned Parenthood said the grants from Komen weighed in at about $680,000 in 2011 and $580,000 the year before and that they went to at least 19 of its affiliates. Incidentally, Planned Parenthood’s political activism arm spent almost $735,000 to defeat Handel during the recent campaign.
View Comments
Bombthrowers is a blog about politics and the war for the hearts and minds of Americans from a conservative viewpoint.
In line with our name, we do not hold back. We have a take-no-prisoners attitude when it comes to fighting for conservative principles. The Left doesn’t play nice, and that’s why they’ve been winning. It’s time for conservatives to rise up and turn the tide.
We’re not afraid to take on anyone, especially the Washington Establishment—Republican or Democrat.
Bombthrowers is a project supported by the Capital Research Center. Its editor-in-chief is Matthew Vadum.