By Dan Calabrese ——Bio and Archives--July 14, 2014
American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
Even while the chemicals—or at least those the Assad regime has official owned up to -- were handed over in time, their destruction did not meet the deadline, and the demolition is likely to continue for months more. On July 7, for example, the destruction began of some 600 tons of Syrian chemicals aboard a U.S. cargo ship in the Mediterranean; the Pentagon said the process might take about 60 days. Other facilities in Finland working on chemicals destruction had eliminated 11 tons of materials by June 26 but might take 150 days to accomplish their remaining work, according to an OPCW report. Additionally, as Mikulak pointed out, “Syria has failed to engender international confidence that its declaration [of its chemical stockpile] is fully accurate and complete,” and, as he concluded, “the specter of CW use by the Assad regime continues to threaten the Syrian people.”Once the threat of U.S. military action was removed - not that it was ever real to begin with - it was inevitable that this whole weapon-destruction deal would devolve into an endless series of dodges. Why should Assad really do what Obama wants? Putin believes it's in his interests to protect Assad, and he's certainly not going to impose any consequences on him for anything whatsoever. The long and short of it is that Obama ran his mouth, had no intention of backing up his words with action, and needed to be bailed out by Putin under terms favorable to Putin and Assad. Obama has no will to stand up to any bad actor on the global stage. I'd venture to say it annoys him that people expect him to. Bashar Assad picked a very fortunate point in history to try his hand as a sadistic monster.
View Comments
Dan Calabrese’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain
Follow all of Dan’s work, including his series of Christian spiritual warfare novels, by liking his page on Facebook.