"We'll work with Congress where we can, but . . ."
Dan Calabrese , Bio and Archives--November 6, 2015
Guns-Crime-Terror-Security | Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
It's impossible not to notice how brazenly President Executive Order is willing to blow off Congress and simply do whatever he wants, so you can't argue for a second with the view of WSJ editors that he's getting ready to do it again with regard to Guantanamo Bay. The gambit they envision is, having already vetoed the defense authorization bill precisely because it contained a ban on closing Gitmo and bringing the detainees to the U.S., Obama will now propose a new Gitmo closing bill so completely unworkable that it's guaranteed to fail on Capitol Hill. That's the idea
Then he repeats his familiar refrain about how he tried to work with Congress but they just wouldn't reciprocate, so now he must act, blah blah blah, and that's how we'll end up with jihadis in our backyards when we could have kept them in Castro's backyard:White House press secretary Josh Earnest repeated the familiar drill Wednesday. They “work with Congress where we can,” Mr. Earnest said. “But if Congress continues to refuse, I wouldn’t rule out the President using every element of his authority to make progress.” Another day at the office for a progressive President intent on reducing the legislative branch to a nullity. For the record, the National Defense Authorization Act this year contains an explicit congressional ban on transferring detainees to the U.S. through 2016. The White House, meanwhile, says the only way Guantanamo can close is if its prisoners are transferred to facilities inside the U.S. The Pentagon, at White House direction, has explored placing Gitmo prisoners at the U.S. Naval Consolidated Brig in South Carolina; at the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth in Kansas; and in the federal supermax prison in Colorado. Not surprisingly, Members of Congress from these states don’t want to do this. The political dance around Gitmo’s closure has come around every year in the Obama Presidency. Congress puts a ban on transferring detainees in the defense bill, and Mr. Obama threatens a veto. This year is the first he’s followed through.Given how Obama's been all talk and no action on the Gitmo closing since the day he took office, it would be easy to write this off as another empty threat. But there's reason to think he might actually do it. Closing Gitmo has been one of the left's fondest wet dreams ever since the Bush Administration established the prison there, and Obama campaigned on it heavily. To leave office with it still open would be a pretty glaring blotch on his legacy in the eyes of his lefty base.
View Comments
Dan Calabrese’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain
Follow all of Dan’s work, including his series of Christian spiritual warfare novels, by liking his page on Facebook.