There used to be a saying that went “Something’s rotten in the state of Denmark.” The meaning being that something just isn’t right. To say that about Canada is an understatement.
A better statement is perhaps, Pride goeth before the fall.” Too many people are proud of Canada and proclaim its supposed ideals with no appreciation that Canada is an increasingly sick society, socially, politically, ethically, legally and democratically. In fact, a fatal socio-political-judicial gangrene is working within to eliminate the last vestiges of a once healthy and potentially great country.
None of this corruption is hidden away or kept from Canadians, if they cared to look closely. However, the average citizen struggling to provide for his or her family and enjoy the fruits of their labour has of necessity left it to their trusted leaders, educators, judges, business people and parliaments to do what is right; to uphold their inherent freedoms and make sure their laws, principles and culture are protected.
Unfortunately, our citizens have been deceived by the very elites they trusted.
Corruption is readily understood and roundly condemned when the deal is made under the table, hidden from public view. The envelope filled with cash, passed secretly to an influential leader for favours rendered or to be rendered is front page news when discovered. Such corruption, when revealed, is publicly decried and punished.
Canada’s fatal corruptions however, are all above the table. All are quite visible or easily surmised and readily proved. Only major surgery will stop this type of rot but given the moral bankruptcy of the vast numbers of our leaders and those of our fellow citizens who have a vested interest in perpetuating this disease, the surgery is not likely to take place.
The disease we speak of permeates all our institutions and although its beginnings probably originated before the Pearson and Trudeau eras, these men were the instruments of Canada’s massive viral contamination. From 1968 (the election of Trudeau) the disease seriously took hold and manifested itself as putrid boils everywhere he and his cronies went and poisoned everything they touched.
The socialist Liberals continue to practice Trudeau’s assisted suicide of Canada
Lethal Dose # 1
First, Trudeau and his band of French-speaking Quebecers opened the door to uncontrolled immigration while deliberately closing every door possible for the continued immigration from traditional sources (the British Isles and Western Europe). This was a top down French-style government decision, taken without the approval of the English-speaking population. Those who complained of such a massive influx of people with very different political and social traditions were told, “We don’t care what you think, and we are going to do what is best for Canada!”
Lethal Dose # 2
The Official Languages Policy of 1969
The first dose of the deadly virus infecting Canada had been administered. Now came the second. Again, without any demand from Canadians, our French-style top down edict-drunk elitist government, with the cooperation of our own power hungry and morally defunct English-speaking leaders, announced the first Official Languages Act of Canada.
This new law was yet another product of the corrupting Liberal government’s poisonous plan to create a harmonious cross-Canada bilingual public. The financing costs of this nightmare have now almost equaled the total debt of Canada. The ongoing cost is an estimated $17,000,000,000 (Billions) every year.
This Act creates nothing but hatred among Canadian French and English speakers because it has mutated into an employment affirmative action plan for French speakers with regard to the Federal, Provincial civil services and in the military. It is further maliciously infecting governments at the civic level. Canadians do not take kindly to being forced to do anything against their will or being excluded from jobs and careers.
Lethal Dose # 3
The Multicultural Policy of Canada 1971
Next they announced the first multicultural policy of Canada which later mutated into the Multicultural Act of Canada 1988, changing the traditional way Canada absorbed immigrants into their culture. Our traditional way was to allow immigrants to slowly adapt and blend into the community by learning the language if necessary and by discovering for themselves how Canadian laws and manners worked. The result while natural and normal with all its joys, trials and tribulations generally succeeded as it had for hundreds of years, to the advantage of all.
The new multicultural policies require a very different method of immigrant integration. They demanded of Canadians that they accept all new cultures coming to Canada as the equal of their own. The poison being that these policies did not define Canadian culture, its ways and principles. Thus the newcomer, on being told that his particular culture, even if it was the most backward in the world, was the equal of the culture he would find in Canada soon realized that he could demand that his culture be accommodated. He was reassured by the government that Canadians would be forced, by law, to comply.
When he was advised that the leaders from his national or ethnic group only had to apply and all sorts of financial grants would be available to promote his community’s culture and preserve his ways, he was delighted. Talk about creating a festering sore. Even worse, Canadians were told bluntly, they had no special culture and that all the cultures coming to Canada were here to write a new one. Canada was said to be a blank slate.
Many Canadians were stunned and complained about this new policy and particularly about the more elaborate and later Multicultural Act of Canada (1986), again passed with no mandate to do so or any demand from the majority of Canadians to institute such a policy. The traditional democracy of Canada, in English speaking Canada at least, was that no laws affecting any substantial change in the structure of Canada were to be put into effect without the approval of the citizenry. Trudeau followed the French mode of top down; the State knows everything type of government. A manipulative dictatorship replaced our former open democracy. A form of Canadian Apartheid was established.
If there was no demand for such changes originating from the majority of the citizens of Canada where did these policies originate? The demand originated from a very few special ethnic groups who felt they needed reinforcement of their own kind of people and in some cases some felt they had suffered a measure of discrimination in the past. This was seized upon by Trudeau and his coterie of Liberals as a way to break the majority of the English-speaking hegemony. Through Multicultural group funding they could buy the allegiances of the new immigrant and their votes, thus securing what later became known as the natural right of a Liberal governing Party. An added benefit being that only the Quebecoise French speakers would remain as an intact majority. Quebec would increasingly dominate the rest of Canada.
Lethal Dose # 4
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms 1982
Although there are many other factors at work in the terminal virus that has been forced upon Canadians by the politically corrupting Liberals (the Mulroney Conservatives also handed a syringe or two to the corrupters), the final and most horrendous dose of all was the foisting of the duplicitous Charter of Rights and Freedoms on all Canadians. That is the final killer dose of Canada’s hope to ever retrieve its soul and its former civil rights and freedoms.
What, you say? Isn’t the Charter the guarantor of all our freedoms? No, it is just the opposite. The document presumes to tell you what the government thinks are the freedoms you should have! Rather than upholding the rights and freedoms that our ancestors fought, sacrificed and died for, the Liberals allowed a bunch of ethnic groups, special interest groups, lawyers and university intellectuals to scrabble together a much flawed and poorly written document. A document, placing the judges of the land and every minority group, special interest group (all unelected and financed by the public) in a position to change all the laws and individual rights that we once held dear.
Worse, even our Parliament and all provincial legislatures that are supposed to be our supreme lawgivers, reflecting the will of the people, are now being overridden by activist judges pushing social and political agendas from the bench. All they have to do is claim their judgment is based on a “human right” contained in the Charter. Usually such right cannot be clearly found anywhere in the document. If it can’t be found various judges will write it into the Charter or demand that our parliament(s) take precise actions to accommodate their decisions.
These judges, because of the Charter, have thus assumed the right of long ago kings; the belief that they have a “divine right to rule.” In our legal history, we executed King Charles 1st in 1649 in order to establish the supremacy of parliament. Perhaps a somewhat milder punishment needs to be considered for these rogue judges.
Trudeau stood behind the Queen when she signed into effect the Constitution Act of Canada that included the Charter. He derisively did a pirouette behind her, caught by the cameras. Well he might gloat because he had not only buffaloed the Queen but conned Canadians big time. Henceforth, he knew that the people of Canada were to be subjected to the greatest criminal corruption of their democracy and freedoms that ever existed or that any person who valued freedom could ever have believed would come to pass.
School kids, law students and Canadians generally have no concept of our pre Charter freedoms and do not understand the Charter’s implications. They sincerely believe it is the source of all our freedoms. The fact is the Charter seized power from the people and permits our judges and governments to dictate the terms of our very freedoms.
Our parliament no longer is the supreme lawmaker acting to reflect the will of the majority of Canada’s citizens. The individual citizen used to be free to do anything that is not against the law common to all. The Charter turns that freedom upside down because special interest and ethnic groups fought to include a Section in the Charter (Section 15, Sub section 2) enabling the creation of special laws and programs for minorities supposedly in need of special legal protection.
As a result we have the virulent spread of the Human Rights Commission disease and their festering clots of poisonous tribunals spread across the country, following none of our ancient principles of law or justice. Instead, their dictatorial forcing of “equitable outcomes” in favour of their complaining Charter designated minority clientele, all costs paid for out of the pocket of the majority, mandates that gullible majority individuals will always be the victims of these Nazi-like Gauleiter tribunals. These tribunals follow none of the principles of our ancient rules of judicial process.
“Equitable outcomes” means that minority groups and their individuals members cannot be judged on the same basis as a member of the majority. All aspects of racial background, economic or other social disadvantage etc.must are taken into consideration. The facts of the case are not sufficient.
In collusion with all this anti-majority horror, instituted or reinforced by the Charter, are most of our MPPs, MPs, MLAs and the regular courts and judges. Why? Because they know that their future, their excessively rich pay and pensions and all their perks and promotions follow from not rocking the establishment boats or upsetting our ill informed voters. Unfortunately, this includes their listening to or colluding with university human rights “experts,” hundreds of vested interest government funded lobby groups and all the judges from the lowest order of the bench to the Supreme Court of Canada.
Is it any wonder that once these once proud members of our parliaments and the
establishments have succumbed to a series of poisonous personal rationalizations. The term “Human Rights” has come to mean anything anybody or any group can persuade anybody else to believe is a “right” they should have. The Supreme Court of Canada even argued that it was their “human right” under the Charter to set their own pay and benefit scale. They didn’t quite get away with it, but it is proof that the Charter is a very corrupting document.
How long before these lethal doses of poison will kill Canada?
It is hard to say. It is obvious that morality, or ethics if you prefer, has gone out the window. A case in point is the recent vile distortion of the Liberal, NDP and Bloc fraud of a supposed coalition; a sniveling unholy plot to bring down a legitimately elected minority government.
There is a place for a legitimate coalition whereby all minority opposition parties combine to offer an alternative government to replace an elected minority government. However, such was not the case with this corrupt plot. This was a plot whereby the Bloc was not to be combined with the other parties to govern. The coalition for government was to be solely the Liberals and NDP. The Bloc was co-opted to vote in support of the other two ethically deprived and power hungry parties.
But why should we be surprised that in spite of the fact that not one Canadian voter anywhere outside of Quebec voted for the Bloc, these Liberal and NDP leaders were so unethical that they would dare to insult the public by conspiring with the Bloc to dismiss the results of the very recent vote of all Canadians?
The fact is that our representatives and leaders have long since ceased to worry about ordinary Canadians and are so accustomed to worrying only about their state-funded special interest clientele groups and their own financial and political interests that most will do anything to stay in power. Corruption begets never ending corruption.
Pray for a Miracle
The answer as to the terminal date for Canada is dependent upon when decent Canadians generally begin to think about the need to cure all the over-the-table poisonous corruption that now prevails in Canada and look for a political party that will make the necessary changes. To do that they will have to carefully examine every party’s program, analyze it carefully and assess the validity of the opposition’s mandatory negative commentary. otherwise, the patient will die, but like any medical doctor, it would be foolish to say when; a miracle is always possible.
