WhatFinger

Institute for Energy Research

The Institute for Energy Research (IER) is a not-for-profit organization that conducts intensive research and analysis on the functions, operations, and government regulation of global energy markets. IER maintains that freely-functioning energy markets provide the most efficient and effective solutions to today’s global energy and environmental challenges and, as such, are critical to the well-being of individuals and society.

Most Recent Articles by Institute for Energy Research:

Girlie Man Energy

Move over Al Gore. Arnold Schwarzenegger is the new public face of climate alarmism and government-driven energy transformation. But what the irony! When it comes to energy, Arnold is pushing bloat over muscle when he speaks of wind and solar (“green” energy) displacing oil, gas, and coal. Politically correct renewables are dilute and resource intensive compared to the muscular energies found in the ground. Seen another way, the flow of solar (including the wind) is BTU-impoverished versus the sun’s work over the many millions of year. It is not even a beach fight.
- Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Permit? What Permit?

Michael R. Bromwich, director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE), announced this week that the agency is at last granting one solitary deepwater drilling permit in the Gulf of Mexico. Could it be that the Administration is finally softening its position of maintaining a “permitorium” against all offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico?
- Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Secretary Salazar Heads to the Hill to Beg for Bureaucratic Bucks

WASHINGTON – On Wednesday and Thursday of this week, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar will appear before the House Natural Resources Committee and the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee to defend his department’s inaction on offshore permits. In addition, Secretary Salazar will be making the case for a $358 million budget, fifty percent more than was allocated in fiscal year 2010. In anticipation of these hearings, Thomas Pyle, president of the Institute for Energy Research, issued the following statement:
- Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Deathbed Conversion

WASHINGTON- In reaction to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement issuing the first permit for deepwater drilling since the Deepwater Horizon accident, Thomas J. Pyle, president of the Institute for Energy Research, issued the following statement:
- Wednesday, March 2, 2011


U.S. Government Shuts Out Increased Alaskan Oil Production

In the 1970s, the United States built the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) to provide greater access to large reserves of domestic oil in Alaska. Built at a cost of $8 billion (equal to over $39 billion in inflation-adjusted dollars), TAPS moves oil 800 miles from Prudhoe Bay on Alaska’s North Slope to Valdez, a southern port in Alaska.(i) Thirty-three years after start-up in 1977, the pipeline, originally designed to move 2.1 million barrels per day, has a current flow of only 0.68 million barrels per day[ii], less than a third of its capacity due to the production decline at oil fields in Prudhoe Bay and other North Slope areas. There are far more domestic oil resources that could flow through the pipeline, but the federal government continues to deny Americans access to these energy resources.
- Wednesday, February 23, 2011


Energy Forecasts Agree on Global Fossil Fuel Domination

Fossil fuels are dominating the world’s energy market—a trend that will last for at least the next 20 to 25 years, the leading energy forecasters contend. According to these forecasters, it does not matter whether policies remain the same or whether anti-fossil fuel policies are enacted—fossil fuels will continue to produce 75 to 80 percent of the world’s energy by 2030.
- Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Obama’s Budget: Central Planning the Nation’s Energy Sources

In American political discourse, everyone pays lip service to the virtues of free-market capitalism, and everyone recognizes the disaster of outright socialism. Yet through its massive power to tax, spend, and regulate, the federal government can achieve backdoor central planning, where federal officials pick winners and losers. We see this pattern all too clearly in President Obama's recent budget proposal and its impact on the American energy sector.
- Saturday, February 19, 2011

Everybody’s Got One: Obama, Salazar Running Out of Excuses

WASHINGTON--Two major developments this week spell trouble for the Obama Administration's war on affordable energy. Energy majors ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, Chevron, and Shell announced the completion of a state-of-the-art Marine Well Containment System (MWCS) capable of controlling catastrophic spills like the Deepwater Horizon accident this past spring. In addition, Federal Judge Martin Feldman granted Ensco Offshore an injunction, ordering Secretary Salazar to act on five deepwater permits within thirty days. Thomas Pyle, president of the Institute for Energy Research, released the following statement in response:
- Saturday, February 19, 2011

Greenpeace Still Tilting at Windmills in Spain

Gabriel Calzada is Associate Professor of Economics at the King Juan Carlos University in Spain and Founder-President of the Instituto Juan de Mariana. Just in time for President Obama's new budget with a large increase in spending on 'clean energy' (renewables), and the coincidental hearing in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on Green Jobs and Trade, Greenpeace is weighing in to try and rehabilitate President Obama's erstwhile model for these schemes: Spain.
- Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Countries Worry about Rare Earth Metal Supplies

China controls 97 percent of the world's supplies of rare earth metals used in weapon systems and in many modern technological devices, including wind turbines, hybrid cars, and electronics.(i) China views itself as the OPEC of rare earth metals because the country can affect the supply by limiting its exports to countries dependent on its rare earth metal resources. China controls the world's market for rare earth elements, not because China has the vast majority of rare earth reserves (in fact, China only has 36 percent of identified rare earth reserves[ii]), but because China does not impose the regulations on mining rare earths that other countries do. China can control the market at lower cost, putting other competition out of business. It has cut export quotas, increased export taxes and even banned exports of rare earths to Japan due to a maritime territorial dispute.[iii] As a result, countries are concerned about supplies of rare earth elements.
- Tuesday, February 15, 2011

The True Energy Threat to the United States National Security?

imageH. Sterling Burnett, is a Senior Fellow with the National Center for Policy Analysis, a non-partisan, non-profit research institute with offices in Dallas, Texas and Washington, D.C. President Obama continues to tout his support for moving to a “clean” energy economy, confidently asserting in his State of the Union Address and subsequent speeches around the country, that his administration’s program of subsidies, government grants and tax breaks for green energy technologies will, reduce our dependence on foreign oil and thus improve the United States’ national security.
- Friday, February 11, 2011


Secure Oil Resources: Where Can We Get Them?

The turmoil in Egypt has made many worry about our oil supply, seeing prices rise due to the conflict. The issue raises the question of where we should be getting oil to ensure the security of its supply. Obviously the first place is at home. But with the Obama Administration placing a moratorium on offshore drilling in the Gulf followed by a de facto ban, withholding the final stages of a permit from Shell to drill offshore in Arctic waters of the Beaufort Sea in Alaska(1), and withdrawing leases on Federal lands that contain vast resources of shale oil[ii], the only choice for the United States is to turn to oil imports for its supply.
- Thursday, February 10, 2011

EPA Will Destroy Jobs, Not Create Them

One of the hot political debates raging in Washington is the effect the EPA--and specifically, its plans to regulate greenhouse gas emissions--is having on businesses. According to the WSJ, trade associations and businesses single out the EPA as the #1 target when they complain about stifling federal burdens.
- Thursday, February 10, 2011


War on Affordable Energy Continues

imageGas prices were already ticking upward before Egypt disintegrated into political turmoil, but the Obama Administration is accelerating that trend by not issuing permits for domestic energy development and exploration. Today, Royal Dutch Shell announced that they would postpone their arctic drilling project in the Beaufort Sea--a region estimated to have billions of barrels of oil--because they cannot secure the necessary permits. We can add this company to the list of those wishing to do business in the United States, but cannot as a result of regulatory green tape.
- Saturday, February 5, 2011


Blinder Understates the Cost of a Carbon Tax

In a recent article (“The Carbon Tax Miracle Cure,” Jan. 31) Alan Blinder listed numerous alleged benefits of a phased-in carbon tax. His main argument is that it would stimulate job creation in new technologies and techniques. Out of his entire column, he devoted a single sentence to the possible downside of his plan when he wrote, “No one likes to pay higher taxes.” A more balanced assessment shows that a carbon tax presents very real dangers, even if we rely on the same economic analysis that so enthralled Blinder.
- Thursday, February 3, 2011

Sponsored
!-- END RC STICKY -->