A DNC Khan Job to Keep the People Ignorant

---

---

Khan Job

It should then come as no surprise that the headlines aren't about Islamic terror or the economy---a dying, American economy reminiscent of 1949, For those playing Pokemon Go, that was 67 years ago. Yet, the #TrumpOlympics has commenced as the press runs 24/7 with some Gold Star parents--the Khan's, and the DNC tries desperately to pole-vault them to the newly crowned victims of the "soulless" Donald Trump. Other Gold Star parents were not given multiple interviews or an ounce of sympathy regarding the loss of their child to Islamic terrorists. Instead, the press dismissed Patricia Smith's anguish and referred to her son as another sacrifice in times of war. A Liberal writer from GQ wanted to "beat Patricia Smith to death" after her RNC speech. But, at this point, what difference does it make? The press gave only 70 seconds of airtime to Patricia Smith as they "reported" from the RNC. In this political fog of war between Hillary, the Khans, the MSM Vs. Donald Trump, Iran is on the brink of nuclear proliferation with the help of Obama's $400 million ransom payment for 4 American hostages, The Islamic State of Turkey is taking shape, and Isis is emboldened and growing. Ironically, in the wake of the many scandals and continued bloodshed, the Democrats have suddenly found The Constitution--used as a prop and waved by Mr. Khan while standing next to his hijab-clad wife. The Khans were both rightfully and respectfully acknowledged and honored as Gold Star parents of Capt. Humayun Khan, who was killed by a roadside bomb, in Iraq in 2004. Yet, the Kahn's weren't there to speak out against the Islamic terrorists who killed their son. Nor did they blame Hillary Clinton--the woman who voted for the war, the Iraqi theater in which their son paid the ultimate sacrifice. As I watched them that night, I found the visual and accompanying speech by the Khans quite odd. What I thought was the new and improved Code Pink developing before my eyes suddenly became a DNC talking-point attack on Donald Trump's immigration policies. I was taught at a young age to not raise your fist unless you're willing to use it. We can argue about the judgment of Donald Trump entering the fray and "stepping in it"--as we now know that the media is Hillary's life jacket. But, one simple question that has not been asked during this media love affair with the Khans is their position on Sharia law and whether they believe that Sharia law trumps our constitutional law? According to Mr. Khan's work and advocacy, he does.

Khan's Jobs

What we now know about Mr. Khan's professional life calls into question his life-long advocacy for Sharia law: Exposed by Walid Shoebat: "Even more troubling, Khan recommends Muslims to use Al-Wathaiq Al-Siyasiyah (Political Documents, see snippet in Sources #2 below) regarding "Islam and politics" by Dr. M. Hamidullah which records 250 documents that includes Jihad in Islam amongst all other things that pertains to fundamental Shariah from an Islamist point of view. Any search on Al-Wathaiq Al-Siyasiyah from the Arabic would yield a library on violent Jihad and its promotion which Khan also promotes. This should shut up our critics, Khan's work pegs that Sharia is fundamental, fixed, with little or no room for any wiggle and Muslims need to trust and obey." As Breitbart reports, Mr. Khan can not only be further tied to Saudi Arabia, but to the Clinton Foundation as well. Upon exposing this information, the media darlings of the Clintons spun this exposé as " Thin Oppo Research attacking a Muslim Gold Star family." However, upon the revelation of this "thin oppo research," the website of Mr. Khan's law firm suddenly disappeared. Why did Mr. Khan swing at first Donald Trump's immigration policies and not the Islamic Terrorists who killed his son? Maybe because Mr. Khan does not equate Islam with terror? And maybe, as the Washington Examiner reports: "The father of a Muslim-American soldier killed in Iraq who is caught up in a war of words with Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is an immigration lawyer who specializes in a highly controversial program accused of letting immigrants buy their way into the U.S. Khizr M. Khan's website notes that he works to help clients with the E-2 and EB-5 programs that let overseas investors buy into U.S. companies and also provides green cards for family members." Thankfully, these programs have recently come under congressional scrutiny and are being challenged by Chuck Grassley. Nonetheless, the moment the Khans stepped on stage and became political advocates for Hillary's immigration policies, they abandoned their proclaimed need for a return to private life---a private life which included daily multiple television interviews, news paper op-eds, and their latest calls for the GOP presidential nominee to step down. The Khans don't seem to want to go away quietly, and the press and the Khanservatives are anxious to help in their mission to save Hillary.

The Khanservatives

Immediately jumping in to help the DNC and Hillary craft the next headlines for the media, was none other than the GOP moderate, Ohio Governor John Kasich. His tweet was picked up by Hillary Clinton and retweeted tens of thousands of times: John McCain, the 79 year old senator from AZ, followed his lead and reiterated the left's talking points by admonishing Trump for "attacking" the Khan family. The marginalized #NeverTrump movement seized their latest Lefty opportunity. For a movement who proudly claims to be comprised of Constitutional Conservatives, they have abandoned any principles related to sovereignty in their support of Gary Johnson and have abandoned all conservative principles in their continued defense of Hillary Clinton through their relentless attack of Donald Trump. In response to these attacks, the Trump campaign has appealed to members of Congress for their support. Reuters reports: "A senior Senate Republican aide, who asked not to be identified, said Republican senators were pleased with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's statement on Sunday calling Captain Khan "an American hero" and noting "a travel ban on all members of a religion is simply contrary to American values." At the same time, the aide said the controversy would probably not cause Republican senators to withdraw their endorsements of Trump." In his first interview after the Khans attacked his policies and his character, Donald Trump referred to Captain Khan as an American hero, defended himself from the baseless attacks--as he is known to do, and asked the questions the media and the Khanservatives refuse to do before jumping to conclusions. At the RNC, Donald Trump promised the American people the Truth. Julian Assange has promised to expose more of the Truth in the coming days. The Khanservatives can choose to speak honestly about broken visa programs and unabated immigration in relation to increased terror risks, or they can continue their losing streak to someone like Paul Nehlen. When it comes to honesty, the history of the Khanservatives is to choose payouts and power over patriotism and globalist bridges over sovereign borders....just like their progressive champion, Hillary Clinton. BREAKING NEWS: We just began bombing Libya because of a contained, non-Islamic group named ISIS. Can someone in the press or at the RNC ask Hillary, Obama or John Kerry, if "this is what democracy looks like" or should the majority of news consumers be kept in ignorance by a Khan Job designed by the DNC and implemented by the media? What a Khanundrum.