By Bob Hoye ——Bio and Archives--April 15, 2021
Global Warming-Energy-Environment | CFP Comments | Subscribe | Email Us


On the longer term, which really is climate, Solar physicists Penn and Livingston in the early 1990s concluded that the very long trend of increasing Solar activity would reverse to a lengthy trend of diminishing activity. And with that the warming trend out of the Little Ice Age would reverse to cooling.
The following from Electroverse shows the chart since the maximum with Solar Cycle 21. SC 24 was the weakest since the early 1900s and the chart shows the predicted lows for SC 25 and SC 26. Some 30 years ago, Penn and Livingston got it right.
Over the same 30 years, global warmers have been getting it wrong.

It is worth emphasizing that “models” connecting increasing CO2 concentrations have not been working. And that those based upon known cycles have been working.
Carbon Dioxide and the even more sinister cousin Carbon have been promoted as vehicles of fear. To establish control by ambitious politicians, bureaucrats and academics. Motivating reasons for raising taxes and imposing regulations.
If these promoters were serious about altering the climate, they would change the Solar Cycle.
Another chart from GWPF appeared this week. And it shows the now lengthy decline in Solar activity along with the remarkably regular changes from warming El Ninos to cooling La Ninas.

View Comments
Bob Hoye (BobHoye.com) has been researching investments for decades, which eventually included the history of financial and political markets. He considers now to be the most fascinating time for both since the Great Reformation of the 1600s. Bob casts a caustic eye on all promotions and, having a degree in geophysics, is severely critical of the audacity that a committee can “manage” not just the economy, but also the temperature of the nearest planet. He has had articles published in major financial journals and, as a speaker, has amused assemblies in a number of cities, from London to Zurich to Tokyo.