By Dan Calabrese ——Bio and Archives--March 15, 2018
Guns-Crime-Terror-Security | CFP Comments | Subscribe | Email Us
The really infuriating thing about this is not that he offers a lame explanation. It's that he offers none to speak of. If he'd said, gosh, we get so many tips and we whiffed on not picking this one out as a serious one, at least you'd have a sense of what went wrong.
But instead, this:The deputy director of the FBI says the agency could have and should have done more to investigate information it received prior to last month’s massacre at Florida’s Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee, David Bowdich said authorities will never know if any investigative work would have prevented the shooting, “but we clearly should have done more.” The FBI has acknowledged it receive separate tips related to the accused shooter, Nikolas Cruz. Bowdich says the tips occurred on September 25, 2017 and on Jan. 5. He says he doesn’t know why the “very explicit” tip from Jan. 5 was not forwarded to local law enforcement. Bowdich says the FBI “will not hide” from its mistakes.Does he really not know why the tip wasn't forwarded it? The FBI investigates why stuff happens, after all. How hard would it be to find out? How hard would it be to find out who received the tip, who logged it, and what informed the decision to do nothing further with it?
View Comments
Dan Calabrese’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain
Follow all of Dan’s work, including his series of Christian spiritual warfare novels, by liking his page on Facebook.