WhatFinger

This fall the Supreme Court will settle the Evenwel v. Abbott case, determining whether or not electoral districts should be drawn based on the number of eligible voters or a state's total population

How the Supreme Court’s ‘One Person, One Vote’ Case Could Boost Republican Clout


By Heritage Foundation Natalie Johnson——--September 16, 2015

| CFP Comments | Subscribe | Email Us


The Supreme Court will trek into a redistricting case this fall that will settle the contested meaning of the “one person, one vote” principle that has shaped American elections for over half a century.
Donate

At hand is whether electoral districts should continue to be drawn using a state’s total population, which is the current precedent, or if the system should shift to account only for eligible voters. The two Texans who filed the case, Evenwel v. Abbott, argued the weight of their votes was diluted because the state used raw population to draw its electoral districts, which included a large number of ineligible voters such as immigrants legally in the U.S. who do not hold citizenship and illegal immigrants. More...

View Comments

Heritage Foundation——

The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with more than 453,000 individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973,  mission is
to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.



{lockerdome-smartview-article-sticky}