By Robert Laurie —— Bio and Archives April 13, 2018
Comments | Print This | Subscribe | Email Us
In his new book A Higher Loyalty, former FBI Director James Comey admits what most observers had inferred — that the overwhelming conventional wisdom that Hillary Clinton was going to win on Election Day played a role in his fateful decision to refocus the campaign on the email matter in late October. “It is entirely possible,” Comey writes, “that because I was making decisions in an environment where Hillary Clinton was sure to be the next president, my concern about making her an illegitimate president by concealing the restarted investigation bore greater weight than it would have if the election appeared closer or if Donald Trump were ahead in all polls. But I don’t know.”
“I have read she has felt anger toward me personally, and I’m sorry for that. I’m sorry that I couldn’t do a better job explaining to her and her supporters why I made the decisions I made”None of that is really the point, though. Comey shouldn’t have been making ANY decision based on who would, or wouldn’t, win the 2016 election. He’s supposed to make decisions based solely on the rule of law. If Hillary broke the law, she should have been indicted and prosecuted. If not, she should have been exonerated. Instead, we got a little of both when he offered a list of crimes committed and a decision to let her off the hook. Regardless of how you feel about Hillary, this passage – from Comey’s own book – confirms what we’ve all known all along. His handling of the matter was politically influenced. No matter what he ultimately decided, “The polls” should have had nothing to do with it.
Robert Laurie’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain.com
Be sure to “like” Robert Laurie over on Facebook and follow him on Twitter. You’ll be glad you did.