Obamacare, "Largely Successful"?

By John Lillpop —— Bio and Archives October 29, 2014

Comments | Print This | Subscribe | Email Us

Adding to the well-deserved reputation of the New York Times as an unreliable, left-biased propaganda sheet posing as an objective, truth-seeking instrument of the people in a nation that treasures appropriate and vigorous oversight of powerful politicians, is the following statement which appeared in the October 27, 2014 edition under the misnomer, Editorial, which should have been labeled Sycophant Musings:

“After a year fully in place, the Affordable Care Act has largely succeeded in delivering on President Obama's main promises." Egad! Who in the hell writes such nonsense—an Obama speech writer on loan from the White House? In fact, ObamaCare was passed exclusively by Democrats based on the following promises, or, more likely, deliberate misrepresentations: ( ) Millions of heretofore uninsured would be added to the ranks of the insured, resulting in reduced overall health care costs; ( ) Individuals would be able to keep their physicians and health care plans, if they chose; ( ) The bill would not add to the federal deficit. As of today, ObamaCare has failed, or is in the process of failing, miserably on all counts. In addition, neither the NYT or anyone else in the general public is able to really measure the success or failure of this Marxist scheme because Obama has unlawfully changed implementation schedules so as to mask the truth until after the 2014 elections, now just days away. Just as Obama’s handling of the war in Iraq brought about the terror horror known as ISIS, and a litany of other domestic and foreign policy disasters, Barack Obama has proven spectacularly inept, all the while convinced within his own deluded, narcissistic brain that he is right and reality in wrong. Only a fool, such as the writer of the October 27 “editorial” cited, would take Obama and his presidential “success” seriously. Shame on the New York Times!