A Boom or a Bust: Raising the Minimum wage?

The minimum wage was never meant to be a “living wage”

The minimum wage was never meant to be a “living wage” that proponents claim for someone supporting a family, it was meant mainly for teenagers looking for extra spending money, and retired people looking to supplement their pensions and savings. For teenagers, it is a means of getting experience in the business world which hopefully will give them experience for future employment.

Think of how many of today's business executives started out as minimum wage workers, and have risen through the ranks to become successful in the companies they worked for as a minimum wage worker, or who have been successful in other businesses as a result of their work experience as a teenager or college student? For me, as I worked my way through college, I got a part-time job at the prevailing minimum wage (at that time $1.00 per hour), and have never regretted that experience that I received doing that job.

My main career in life (besides owing and operating a coin-operated laundromat) was that of a business education high school teacher who used some of that experience in the curriculum I taught for over 30 years.

Wouldn't it be better for a worker to be employed at, let's say, $10 per hour than to be unemployed at $20 per hour?

When California's $20 per hour minimum wage law goes into effect, two major things will occur. Number one, many businesses who hire entry level employees, will have to raise their prices to meet the higher costs of doing business, with the result of possibly losing customers, and eating into their business income. In addition, many people who worked at those companies, mainly teenagers and senior citizens, will be laid off or their hours will be cut back. Secondly, many small companies or stores will go out of business since they'll be unable to make a profit as a result of those extra operating costs of doing business.

To answer the proponents of the government mandating higher minimum wages, I'd ask this question, wouldn't it be better for a worker to be employed at, let's say, $10 per hour than to be unemployed at $20 per hour? Let the free market prevail in letting employers set their own wage rates as they see fit, and are able to encourage workers to join their company or store. If they can't find workers at the wage they offer, they'll have to raise them to attract employees, but that should be their decision, not the government’s decision.

Let the free market prevail, and the government should keep its hands off

Our country has an inflation rate that is up around 20% from 3 years ago. By instituting the higher minimum wage it will encourage the inflation rate to increase more, as the prices of goods and services will also increase. It will be like a domino effect upon our economy making it difficult for the average American to make ends meet. Can you imagine Walmart paying a “greeter” $20 per hour to say “Welcome to Walmart”? It has been reported that McDonald's “Big Mac” meal now costs $18. Can the average McDonald's diner really afford that?

So when the minimum wage is increased in California and around the country, or even the ridiculous amount of $50 per hour as proposed by that California Senate candidate, the negative effects upon our country will be profound. We should let the free market prevail, and the government should keep its hands off, as their record of government interference has been disastrous in practically all endeavors they get involved in. There are two many people in our country that want us to play with the “Socialists” playbook, which hasn't worked in our country or anywhere else in the world. We are a constitutional democratic republic, not a pure democracy, if we can keep it, as the erudite founding father, Benjamin Franklin, once proclaimed. Let's hope we can keep it.