American Chemtrails
Some U.S. government agencies are more imaginative than others when it comes to creating strange, very expensive and potentially dangerous projects in the cause of mitigating the Climate Change hoax.
The aptly named LOC-NESS project of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Martha’s Vineyard is a geo-engineering project designed to take carbon dioxide (CO2) out of the atmosphere and lock it in the ocean. The idea is to dump six thousand gallons of sodium hydroxide with chemical colorings into the ocean 10 miles south of Martha’s Vineyard to create a "carbon sink" that will draw 20 tons of CO2 out of the atmosphere and into safe storage in the ocean. They started the project with a government grant of $4.4 BILLION from the U.S. National Science Foundation. So far there is no bragging by Woods Hole that spending billions of taxpayer dollars has been able to stop global warming. Is it too early, or is no news bad news?
The citizens of New Hampshire became worried about chemtrails and their state legislators sprang into action. Representatives Jason Gerhard and Kelley Potenza, both Republicans, sponsored a bill called “The Clean Atmosphere Preservation Act” that would prohibit “the intentional release of polluting emissions, including cloud seeding, weather modification, excessive electromagnetic radio frequency, and microwave radiation and made penalties for violation of such prohibition.” On February 8, the bill was reported out of committee as ““Inexpedient to Legislate.” In legislator talk, it means the bill was dead.
New Hampshire license plates boast the motto, “Live Free or Die.” I can imagine lobbyists swarming the State House in Concord paying the legislators to take the ‘die option.’
Our National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the UN, the folks who gave us Covid lockdowns, masks, deadly vaccines and a gigantic hole in our economy are now also in the chemtrail business. They call it Solar Radiation Modification (SRM) which means blotting out sunlight in the name of “a climate-resilient future.” You can read all about it at: Solar geoengineering to reduce climate change: a review of governance proposals
NIH is okay with injecting sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere, but they do worry about having large aircraft with advanced engines that can do those “injections” high enough in the stratosphere. Considering the vaccine injections those co-conspirators gave the planet in the last three years, what could possible go wrong?