17 goals of Agenda 2030, outlining much more specific plans to “Transform the World”
When the debate raged over how to achieve these goals, the UN regularly added new details to follow. Most notable were the 17 goals of Agenda 2030, outlining much more specific plans to “Transform the World.” Then came Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez and her Green New Deal, and most recently, the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset. The bottom-line goals for all these plans are elimination of free enterprise, private property rights, and individual choice. In short, the three pillars of Freedom which America’s Founders fully understood were the roots of a free society.
As the battle began and the Democrat Party started to push for enforcement of the agenda, those of us who worked to sound the alarm and expose the dangers were quickly labeled “conspiracy theorists” and “hate mongers.” In many cases these labels were even used by Republican and even mainstream conservative organizations. Somehow these forces refused to even acknowledge that such an agenda existed. While the Leftist advocates used every emotional tool to sell the agenda through fear, the Republican leadership simply scoffed, calling it misdirected ignorance, not worthy of attention.
And so, for thirty years the agenda has been slipped into nearly every policy as government has grown to massive size and intrusion in our everyday lives, dictating how we live, what transportation we may use, how much energy is available for our everyday needs, and how private enterprise must comply in producing their products. In addition, under the social equity Thought Police, our interactions with neighbors and community culture are being torn apart under the label of racism. Now we’re facing an Artificial Intelligence (AI) threat to our personal privacy, job availability, and the earned currency in our pocket.
The response from Republicans has been confusion. Instead of attacking the very root of the agenda and its tyrannical enforcement, Republicans have tried to be “reasonable” as they accept the agenda, but in a lighter manner. Yes, of course, we must acknowledge man’s threat to the environment, they say. Then they offer the Green New Deal Light! Not as radical, but will fix the problem, goes the argument.