Consider what game Spain may be playing
Fed Chair introduces new quantitative easing – can it succeed?
Today’s Detailed Commentaries
Eurozone >> Spain: Consider what game Spain may be playing
That Spain will request – likely in weeks and not months – financial aid from its eurozone partners seems a certainty. Why Spain is playing a ‘wait and see’ game is an interesting question.
My current thoughts are that Spain is waiting on – very likely among other things:
- the audit reports on its banks scheduled (so far) for release this month, and that the Spanish Government must by now have received at least interim reports from those completing said audits;
- finalization of what it may hope to be precedent setting negotiations with Greece in respect of the Greek financial bailout; or,
- further developments in Italy; and,
- knowledge of the maturation of Germany’s thinking and position(s) in all of this.
Postponement of dealing with Eurozone and Eurozone country specific problems is, from everything I have read and heard to date, doing nothing but exacerbating what almost certainly is becoming an ever more difficult and ‘hard to solve’ problem.
Topical Reference: Spain urged to clarify aid needs at euro zone meeting, from CNBC from Reuters, September 14, 2012 – reading time 3 minutes.
North America >> United States: Fed Chair introduces new quantitative easing – can it succeed?
By the time you read this you will have been over-exposed to the news that yesterday Fed Chair Bernanke announced further U.S. ‘quantitative easing’ without a stated end-date. Mr. Bernanke announced the U.S. Federal reserve will purchase up to U.S.$40 billion of mortgage-backed securities each and every month until it saw ‘a sustained upturn in the weak U.S. jobs market’.
Say what you will, from my perspective for any such a plan to succeed:
- I have to be wrong that the United States suffers from structural unemployment, as I believe that the greater is U.S. structural unemployment, the less is the probability of meaningful U.S. job creation in the next 27 months – and, of course, vice versa;
- I have to be wrong that manufacturing jobs are more important to economic growth than are service jobs, as I do not believe that as a consequence of globalization and loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs the U.S. will be able to create enough ‘average-pay’ service jobs to bring the U.S. unemployment rate down significantly from current levels over the next 27 months, particularly as the U.S. population grows over that period; and,
- I believe the only way it is likely for the U.S. employment rate to be as low as 7% by the end of 2014 (see following) is if the U.S. Federal Government, pursuant to bipartisan agreement, in the next few months finds funding for Federal Government sponsored infrastructure programs, and quickly overrides the views of vocal minorities to enable large energy projects such as the Keystone Pipeline project to go ahead.
- that it is (not including this current month) 27 months to and including December 2014. Assuming no changes to this new quantitative easing and that it extends to that date, the new Federal Reserve expenditure will total just under U.S.$1.1 trillion by the end of 2014; and,
- what is going on in the world generally (witness the current maelstrom in North Africa and the Middle East, and the many other societal problems that seem to appear with more regularity every month), and among other ‘economic things’:
- the world economy generally,
- the Eurozone financial crisis,
- the increasing concerns over further slowdown in China’s economic growth,
- the economic uncertainty of the U.S.,
- United Kingdom economic recession and uncertainty,
- ongoing globalization generally; and,
- what seems to be the economic unpredictability of globalization as it evolves.
- determine what odds you would give that any prediction made today of one country-specific economic statistic at December 2014 will prove to be accurate;
- consider how much of your wealth you would bet on such a thing; and
- consider whether all of this is something worth discussing with your investment advisor.
Read next: Canadian Prime Minister is Playing a Very Dangerous Game
Email Us | Reader Friendly | Comments
Ian R. Campbell——Bio and Archives
Ian R. Campbell, FCA, FCBV, is a recognized Canadian business valuation authority who shares his perspective about the economy, mining and the oil & gas industry on each trading day. Ian is also the founder of Stock Research Portal, which provides stock market data, analysis and research on over 1,600 Mining, Oil and Gas Companies listed on the Toronto and Venture Exchanges.
Note: The Commentary and information above is provided ‘AS IS’ and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice.
