FBI now has 'avalanche' of evidence in Clinton Foundation probe

Even before the WikiLeaks dumps of alleged emails linked to the Clinton campaign, FBI agents had collected a great deal of evidence, law enforcement sources tell Fox News. "There is an avalanche of new information coming in every day," one source told Fox News, who added some of the new information is coming from the WikiLeaks documents and new emails. FBI agents are "actively and aggressively pursuing this case," and will be going back and interviewing the same people again, some for the third time, sources said.

Keep in mind, the investigation into the Clinton Foundation is seperate from the investigationn of her schlock, homebrew e-mail server. The two are obviously related, but the July announcement by James Comey that Hillary would not be charged - which might now be null and void anyway - covered only the e-mails. The Foundation probe is the one we've been telling you for the last several days the Justice Department is doing everything it can to obstruct.

Apparently, Loretta Lynch didn't put up enough resistance. We're told there's at least one source who claims indictments are likely. Needless to say, this is all trickling out now in a very unusual manner because of the timing. We're six days away from an election in which one of the main targets in this probe might be elected president. The investigators may or may not be able to finish the investigation and make an official report of their findings in time to stop us from electing a criminal under indictment, but they can leak things to the press. Bret Baier makes sense as a leak recipient because you know Fox won't bury the story, but at the same time Baier's reputation is not that of a partisan shill. The first 11 minutes of last night's Special Report have lots of detail:

This video is no longer available.

What we've learned the last few days obviously makes clear that Loretta Lynch is lying in the above clips every bit as much as we suspected. Andrew McCarthy as usual does a great job of explaining why the procedures in this case are unlike what happens in any other case. And yet it doesn't seem to be stopping the avalanche of evidence from ending up in the hands of the FBI. Will this be enough to turn the election in Trump's favor? I've told you before that my political prognostication skills are not good. My sense of it is that all this information is washing over people quickly and it's making them reconsider which of these two candidates is really the safe choice. That's a lot to try to digest in the final few days, and I wouldn't be surprised if it results in a Trump wave on Election Day that hadn't been reflected in any poll, simply because the pollsters didn't have time to detect it. It's not as if the electorate didn't know before today that Hillary is corrupt. But maybe the idea of electing a woman who is actively under multiple FBI investigations and seems likely to be under indictment before Inauguration Day is finally the line American voters aren't willing to cross. Or to put it another way: I have no idea.