Hypocrite Liberals Change Narrative Over Black Holdout Juror

Wokeism and leftists were dealt a blow last week when it was revealed that the only juror with common sense was a black man. At first glance, that statement seems illogical, but it isn’t, because the pink-wearing lunatics on the left were hell-bent on excusing a woman who viciously murdered her three kids in cold blood.

In case you have been in a cave for the last month, Lindsay Clancy’s trial ended in a mistrial when eleven jurors voted for her acquittal, and one brave soul refused to bend to their insanity. This outraged the murderous left because, unlike the rest of the sane world that understood that there is no way she should have been acquitted, they immediately started a hate campaign against the holdout.

Of course, it was easy for them because, in their racist minds, they were sure that this had to be a white guy who was exercising his white privilege. I’m sure they envisioned him as a MAGA Trump supporter, which only emboldened their hatred for him. After all, who did this guy think he was to disagree with them by insisting that it was wrong for anyone to murder three innocent children?

In fact, one of the jurors actually stated that, "He had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children."

Imagine that.

Then last week came the twist that knocked them for a loop. It was easy to disparage a white holdout juror, but when it came out that the man was black, they had to take a step back and reassess all of their hateful rhetoric.

A perfect example of that occurred on CBS Mornings. Watch Gayle King’s reaction when she learns that the holdout was black.

King actually said, “Whoa. I have to sit with that for a second.” This is a black woman who thinks of herself as a fair and impartial journalist, and yet she is stunned that the holdout was black.

Why would that make a difference? It wouldn’t unless you are a closet racist who finds it easy to fantasize about the nonexistent white privilege. To the radical left, if you are white, you are evil. If you are anything other than white, you should be trusted and protected.

How sick are these people? They hate whites so much that now there are nutjobs out there who are white, but are claiming that they are “non-practicing whites,” and yes, they look exactly the way you can imagine.

Think about the paradoxes going on here. First, these people wanted a triple child murderer to be acquitted. That alone is Twilight Zone material. Then they immediately assumed that the person who got in the way of that acquittal had to be white. Even though skin color has nothing to do with it, it never occurred to them that this individual could be non-white.

To rational people, it made no difference what the person’s skin color was. He could have been fluorescent green, and he would have been embraced as a hero. This man did the right thing, despite what the pink freaks want everyone to believe.

There is a proverb that applies very well to the maniacal mob that backed Clancy and the one brave soul who refused to be railroaded into their wrong thinking. It says:

"The truth is still the truth even if no one believes it; a lie is still a lie even if everyone believes it"

Like roaches when the lights go on, the radicals who chastised the lone juror are now scurrying to justify the things they said now that his race has illuminated the circumstances.

Watching them squirm in their smugness and irrational racism does bring some satisfaction, but it won’t change them. These are people who are immune to decency and constructive thought. When Clancy is retried, they will be back in the streets again. My concern is: will the prosecution do a better job picking jurors to ensure this type of moral collapse never occurs again?