I Can't Support Democrats' Mass Migration and Disarmament Policies In 2026-Or Ever

I don't want to live in a country that bows down to people here illegally

However, there are legitimate issues where differences exist and whether we concur or clash, these issues should decide where support goes, as opposed to rote partisanship.

Two looming legitimate issues prompt opposing Democrats claiming the speakership of the US House as part of a winning majority.

1. Mass Migration.

The first is mass migration and the 'blue' party's mania to make this a majority migrant country with one particular migrant group reigning supreme if they're successful in getting voting rights.

My opposition to this policy isn't due to being *double checking* a White nationalist. I'm too dark to be mistaken for one.

It's simply impossible for me to embrace numerical and political irrelevancy after modern Black voting and civil rights have only been recognized in my lifetime. No Leftists or corporate liberals can tell me why this is a good thing, incidentally.

I don't want to live in a country that bows down to people here illegally, and millions of other citizens agree on this point about sovereignty.

I don't want to see struggling citizens told there's no government assistance while local, and under Biden's handlers, federal, authorities transported, fed, housed and compensated individuals who don't obey immigration laws, among others, and defiantly refuse to learn English, which is the language of commerce and governance.

Such arrogance screams 'take over' to me strategically, instead of propaganda that migrants are innocently here to seek opportunity.

A number are seeking supremacy and duped Democrats into thinking their fondest wish is to faithfully serve that party as a permanent menial labor class and virtue signal prop.

Democrats obsession with overruling lawful gun ownership is my other non-negotiable issue

The Democratic Party is hell-bent on displacing what social media influencer Tariq Nasheed calls 'foundational Black Americans', a population whose lineage comes from African captives and their offspring.

Cities with majority or significant Black populations have been targeted as mass migration depots without asking residents for permission. Leftist leadership exclusively highlights pale protesters in these areas as if they speak for residents, which is patently untrue.

The unspoken part is the 'blue' party is tired of dangling rotten carrots in front of an increasingly independent or indifferent Black community. They're not getting high voter turnout anymore and turn instead to expanding the Latino community.

They note with alarm our conspicuous absence at anti-deportation protests. Progressives are scrambling trying to find spokespersons or new talking points establishment mouthpieces can use to motivate a demotivated or disaffected Black base.

Consequently, I can't support Democrats taking the US House or Senate this year.

I don't want to be an invisible minority in their majority migrant country surrounded by often-hostile foreigners following a nationalistic agenda in what's supposed to be 'my' nation.

2. Disarmament.

Lastly, disarmament Democrats obsession with overruling lawful gun ownership is my other non-negotiable issue.

As a 'Gen Xer' doing volunteer safety escorts and occasional paid security in an unsafe 'blue' city, I can't support disarmament while this ideology won't arrest nor sufficiently prosecute traitors to community safety.

They place murderers, rapists, car jackers, armed robbers, home invaders, burglars and thieves on a pedestal. They treat them like they're too good to be imprisoned which is too bad for victimized citizens.

'The Quarter':  A place where armed robbery, carjackings and mass shootings are a roll of the statistical dice

Facing a career criminal surplus means self-defense isn't an abstract notion. It's an absolute necessity embraced without fanfare by folks who support it quietly.

Even 'red' state solutions like constitutional carry which recognize your right to carry concealed firearms for protection is being intruded upon by disarmament Democrats.

No less a 'disarmer' than New Orleans’ recently inaugurated pro-mass-migration, anti-self-defense mayor who infamously tried an end-run around Louisiana's constitutional carry law. She can't stand the idea of citizens evening out the odds in the now-fortified French Quarter while her tourism industry donors sometimes rake in bloodstained money.

It also doesn't escape notice that she welcomed a 'red' state governor's National Guard deployment to secure the very French Quarter whose visitors and residents now, despite her best efforts, can carry weapons for self-defense. 'The Quarter', as it's commonly called, is also known as someplace where armed robbery, carjackings and mass shootings are a roll of the statistical dice.

Toss in an actual terrorist attack last year on world famous Bourbon St. and Democratic arguments against self-defense fall upon especially deaf ears in my case.

I need to be able to readily defend myself against threats they enable.

Period.

So whether Democrats are part of a 'uniparty' or 'duopoly', I can't support publicized goals for making this a majority migrant country with my sector reduced to a deeply disenfranchised, disarmed territory.

Not in 2026.

Or ever.

Nadra Enzi aka Cap Black addresses 'anti safety' theory and policies through advocacy and consulting, usually for free, but please don't tell his hardcore capitalist friends.