Newsom accused President Trump of using the military to “intimidate people” he disagrees with
Calling the celebration an “absurd show of force,” Newsom accused President Trump of using the military to “intimidate people” he disagrees with. That’s rich, coming from a governor whose own party has spent years undermining law enforcement, defying federal immigration law, and tolerating violent protests in the name of “social justice.”
Saturday’s event coincided with the second wave of “No Kings” protests, an erroneously named anti-Trump movement that conveniently paints any display of strength as tyranny. So when Marines fire live rounds in a controlled exercise, it’s “chaos.” But when masked agitators block freeways and torch businesses, it’s somehow an American thing to do.
Let’s talk Constitution. Article I, Section 8 gives Congress the power to call forth the militia to suppress insurrections and execute federal law. Article II gives the President the authority to execute those laws. The National Guard (and our U.S. Military) is not a rogue force. It’s a constitutional tool. And when cities burn, it’s not “intimidation” to restore order. It’s duty.
Newsom’s decision to shut down I-5 wasn’t about protecting drivers. It was about protecting a narrative: that the military (he includes the National Guard in his assessment) is dangerous, untrustworthy, and that it is being politically weaponized by Donald Trump. That’s the story the left needs people to believe if they’re going to sell the idea that Trump is some kind of dictator for using the Guard to constitutionally execute the law.
In truth, the military isn’t the threat. The threat is the erosion of trust in the very institutions that defend us. When governors treat Marines like liabilities, and freeway closures like political statements, we’ve crossed a line.
The Marine Corps didn’t ask for this drama. They asked for respect. And on their 250th birthday, they deserved better.