WhatFinger

Obama’s lies on the campaign trail, Conservative Road Maps

“No New Ideas” – Now That’s A Novel Approach


By Christopher Massie ——--August 30, 2010

American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us


In the early years of the 20th century, as the Provisional Government of Russia was waging two wars – the first against Germany for its very survival, the second against Lenin and his Bolsheviks as this pathological Marxist spread his poisonous rhetoric throughout Russia – history was about to author yet another page that today’s administration now turns to for guidance.

After the fall of the Provisional Government, Lenin would ascend to power; installing his regime, nullifying all campaign promises made to the very minority groups who installed him to power, and embarking on a systematic elimination of the population that led to millions of deaths and the Russian Civil War. But it would be the inner turmoil, the battles within the Russian “Congress”, that today’s administration is perfectly mirroring. History teaches and supports the claim that only one man in Russia’s 20th century was more disturbed than Lenin – that man being Stalin. Yet Stalin was not one of the more intellectually gifted of Lenin’s inner circle; in fact Stalin was actually, at times, Lenin’s adversary. When Stalin, aided by two incognito editors, launched the Saint Petersburg PRAVDA, it appeared Stalin sided with Lenin. Later revealing the editors and then siding with the Provisional Government, in direct conflict with Lenin, Stalin himself would become a catalyst for starting the February Revolution of 1917. Stalin continued this maneuvering through one battle after another; committing to neither Lenin nor the Provisional Government, until the battle of October 1917. The Provisional Government, desperate to protect Saint Petersburg from annihilation, released Lenin and the jailed Bolsheviks. Stalin, eyeing the attack on the Government by the freed Bolsheviks, finally committed to Lenin, joining ranks, thus becoming part of the most catastrophic regime Russia would ever suffer. Why Lenin considered Stalin a trusted ally – a comrade – remains a question to this day. The two were constantly at odds, particularly so as Lenin approached his last days. Lenin’s theory was that the continued Revolution was to proceed; Russia would conquer wherever possible. Additionally, Lenin’s plan outlined his goals for building a “Union of Soviet Republics”; as conquests were successful, the nationalities within these regions – Georgians, Ukrainians, Armenians, etc – were to have their own central governments. Stalin, on the other hand, considered this notion by Lenin far too liberal. So liberal, in fact, that Stalin took to verbal assaults upon Krupskaya (Lenin’s wife) – who would be Lenin’s spokesperson when he became bedridden – to such a degree that Lenin finally would decree Stalin unfit for the position of General Secretary. Having already formed an unbreakable Politburo (then a five member policymaking and governing body consisting of Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, Kamenev, and Krestinsky), however, Stalin was permanent in his position as one of the most powerful men in Russia. Upon Lenin’s death, Stalin would ascend to ruler of Russia – without competition from party members; praising Lenin through simplification of Leninism – all the while harboring contempt for Lenin deep inside. The infighting and bitter rivalries witnessed by the Bolsheviks – especially Lenin, Stalin, Kamenev, Zinoviev (the newest member of the Politburo) and Trotsky very much resemble the scene in Chicago preceding the campaign for president in 2008. The Democrats were busily shuffling themselves about, as one of their own, U.S. Representative Mel Reynolds (D-2) was indicted; his seat in Congress becoming available in the winter of 1994. Reynolds would not find his Max Eastman, and the rest of his party members moved not to support him either. Instead, the Democrats, as did the Bolsheviks against Trotsky, plotted to adjust the players. Just as then, as so often is the case, history is repeating itself. The players in the modern era of Socialism would pit Dr. Alice Palmer, Barack Obama and Jesse Jackson Sr. and Jr. against one another in a scenario eerily reminiscent of days not so long past. In the summer of 1995, Jesse Jackson Sr. met with Dr. Alice Palmer – she being a former member of the U.S. Peace Council (identified by the F.B.I. as a Communist group working to undermine President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s) – to strike a deal wherein Palmer would endorse Jesse Jackson Jr. for Palmer’s vacated Illinois Senate seat. Palmer had vacated her place in the Senate to run for Representative Mel Reynolds’ seat; Jesse felt Jr. was the perfect man for the job in Chicago. As egos go, however, Jesse Jackson Jr. would have nothing to do with Father’s interference; Jr. made his OWN bid for Reynolds’ seat – and won! Palmer, dejected, returned to Chicago and attempted to regain her former place in the Senate. Prior to running for Congress, she had introduced a rather sparkling young Democrat (known for his Marxist beliefs in college) to the elite of Chicago; a fundraiser had been organized by Palmer at the house of Bill Ayers – former head of Weather Underground. This fundraiser would launch Barack Obama’s career, announcing him as the primary candidate to replace Dr. Alice Palmer in the Illinois Senate. With Jesse Jackson, Jr. now seated in Congress, rather than Alice, it was now Palmer’s sincere hope, seeing as Obama had been a long-time friend, ally and comrade, that Obama would relinquish – allowing the poor Dr. Palmer to retain her seat, gliding quietly back into her former life. Did anyone believe that Stalin would allow Trotsky to reenter Congress once the Politburo voted him out? Obama, through the courts, not only removed Palmer from the ballot, he systematically eliminated 100% of the candidates in the Chicago primary that election cycle. Not one candidate ran in contention of Barack Hussein Obama. Senator Obama swept the voting. Stalin was never seriously contended against either… Now we come to campaign season 2010. As one Republican Congressman so dubbed it, we’re entering “The silly season.” Democrats are in a position of power in both the House and Senate, and, as if anyone needed another painful reminder, the office of the president has been seized by a Democrat (to phrase it politely). In less than 2 short years, Obama and/or the Democrats in office have perpetrated: the demise of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (leading to the American and subsequent Global Recessions); government take-over of the two largest car dealerships in the U.S., GM and Chrysler; government take-over of the largest insurance company, AIG; government take-over of the largest U.S. banks, Bank of America and Citibank; government-run student loans; Obama-care; and the latest shining example of Big Government: Obama’s shake-down of the oil industry. These moves are now compounded by $26 Billion “Aid for Teachers” package (more spending); and the$800 Billion “Stimulus” package that accomplished absolutely nothing in terms of creating jobs, or stimulating the national economy. These moves by this administration equate to nothing short of a state run economy; these measures have failed before – for Russia AND for this administration – and they will continue to fail for America. What’s worse is that the United States is more than $13 Trillion in debt and, adjusted to reflect reality, we’re realizing 17% unemployment! So how does Barack Obama convince the American voters – voters who have overwhelmingly voiced their disapproval for the man in one national poll after another – to come out and vote for the Democrats in November? By reaching into the Liberal bag of tricks and pulling out the magic wand, Obama is attempting the oldest sleight of hand ever afforded to politicians: “If I can’t convince you to like ME, I’ll just ask you how much you really like the OTHER guy!” State’s evidence number one: Obama’s daily rhetoric, “Well, you know, the other guys just don’t have any new ideas!” Okay, Obama, let’s talk turkey. First, Obama, lest we ALL forget, what happened to that promise: “President Obama has committed to making his administration the most open and transparent in history.”? Stalin’s priority, from the days of PRAVDA, was to position himself in a seat of authority whereby HE was the man calling the shots; the ultimate goal being the installation of Marxism/Socialism/Communism. Obama’s history with Marxism is well documented in these pages – research at your leisure – we’ll not rehash that subject too deeply within THIS document; suffice to say Obama’s path mirrors Stalin’s (and not by simple coincidence). Silencing opposition is a primary aspect of both individuals. Transparency has no place in an administration such as Obama’s… Addressing Healthcare first, it is critical to recall, though few will remember:
“During the healthcare debate, House and Senate Republicans offered amendments to prohibit the federal government from using comparative effectiveness research to deny or ration care. Democrats rejected them all and moved full steam ahead. But because of the citizen backlash against the federal government using comparative effectiveness research to ration care, the bill that the president signed deceptively renames the new federal body the ‘Patient Centered Outcomes Research Initiative’” – “To Save America – Stopping Obama’s Secular-Socialist Machine by Newt Gingrich”
Further addressing Healthcare, the televised “Blair House summit” was the most ludicrous display of partisanship to that date by Obama. Republicans, backed by the American public, had offered dozens and dozens of constructive, new and noteworthy ideas on the healthcare issue, only to be shut out by Democrats at every turn. By February 2010, the date of “Blair House”, the bulk of the ruinous bills were already through Congress. Obama’s arrogant television appearance was a sham! New ideas from the Republicans don’t stop with Healthcare, either – not by a long shot! Why is Obama so fearful of admitting the contents of Texas Governor Rick Perry’s letter? Now there’s a new idea from a Conservative Republican; Secure the border! The letter written by our governor outlines a detailed plan for securing the United States/Mexico border. This plan includes the precise number of military personnel required and the types of military intelligence that could be utilized, as well as the specialized surveillance technology that’s available to our various states, and, finally, the means of funding these initiatives – to ensure voter approval. Republican Governors indeed have new ideas, Mr. Obama. Your administration – especially YOU – prefer to mislead the country into believing the opposite. Now if the aforementioned ideas, and the dozens of others like them, aren’t enough to seal the case for accusing Obama of lying to us on the subject of we Republicans and our new ideas, let’s consider one of the most complete ideas to come from the Right in years. The “Paul Ryan Road Map for America’s Future”, is one among many of its kind from leading Republicans that lays the groundwork for saving this nation from ruin. This plan, a new plan from Republicans in Congress, paves the way to end Obama’s “culture of dependency” – a culture born from the pages of Marxism/Communism. In addition to the myriad other aspects of this plan, this new roadmap ensures a Healthcare plan for all, free from the lies and distortions written into Obama-care. In short, this roadmap leads Americans back to America. It strikes fear into the veins of Liberals, it terrifies Obama. No wonder Barack is on the campaign trail trying to convince Americans we Conservatives have no new ideas. Once this roadmap goes public – once Independents and Moderate Leftists see the light – the Democrats’ fleeting chances, tied tenuously to Obama’s lies on the campaign trail today, will be as dissolved as the Kool-Aide once considered so sweet to the now-disenchanted many. Remember November, dear Patriots! And share these words with the Liberals in your midst – FOR THE SAKE OF OUR REPUBLIC!

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Christopher Massie——

Christopher Massie, BS, CS, Founder & Patriot of Drain The Swamp 2010,
Critical Reading for the Conservative American


Sponsored