WhatFinger

You buy what they’re selling at your own peril. They have their story and they’re telling it over and over.

A new point about the missing virus


A new point about the missing virusActually, this is a point I’ve made before, but now I’m boiling it down to the bare essentials. Here we go: If you were a) honest and b) the head of a major public health agency, there is something you would do, before declaring COVID a worldwide pandemic requiring extraordinary measures (e.g., lockdowns). You would carry out a study.
Read Full Article...

Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!

The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.

Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.

Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.

We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.

Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.

READ OUR Commenting Policy


CFP Comments


Comments

By I guess the first question on 2022 06 10

How were past viral epidemics verified. Was this type of study conducted?

I don't know. What I do know is...

Jan 2020 The claim was when 10 get the virus, 8 get an upper respiratory infection similar to a flu/cold. 2 get a lower respiratory infection that can attack a weak immune system resulting in the patient chocking on his own bodily fluids when his lungs can't fight the infection. (The call for 'respirators' stage).

Feb 2020. The story got changed. It turned out the infections were when 100 get the virus, 85 have no symptoms, 12 get a Flu/Cold, 3 get a lower respiratory infection. I relaxed and realized comparing this fairly normal influenza level event to the Spanish Flu was simply incorrect. I was no longer concerned.

March 2020. The story changed again. Statistics were showing (particularly from Italy at this point) that the average person was not in danger, this flu's injurious affect was focused on the truly elderly. The aveage age of death was higher than the average life span. But, in March suddenly the CDC threw away it's 40 year old standard for defining death from Influenza and pneumonia and just adopted a WHO advised methodology that simply called any one who died from any cause but tested positive for Covid was a 'Death from Covid'. It was obvious now that there was a conspiracy in place to push a false narrative onto the public.


By Michael Bollinger on 2022 06 10

Most of the deaths were people past their projected lifespan.... point....set.....match. Now tell me how accurate PCR tests are in diagnosing a viral infection? Now back that up with certifiable tracking of what Cycle the PCR tests were run at? Since all we heard were cases cases cases, how were these cases ascertained except by PCR tests run at 49 cyles? Why is there no record or track of these things?



Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Recommended by Canada Free Press


Subscribe

Sponsored