Challenging the Expansive Interpretation of “Religion” Under the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America

Mr. Gibson... please review this research paper Challenging the Expansive Interpretation of 'Religion' Under the first amendment of the Constitution. It is key to eliminating the worship of 'false gods' and tearing down every temple and mosque.


This research paper is critical to removing constitutional protection for foreign belief systems and ideologies that have taken root in America and pose a significant threat to the safety, security, and sovereignty of the nation. It presents a comprehensive constitutional, historical, and biblical challenge to the current expansive interpretation of the word “religion” under the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.

Drawing on the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the Declaration of Independence, the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, the Northwest Ordinance, and the Christian foundations of the American Republic, the report demonstrates that:

  • The modern, broad, and purportedly neutral definition of “religion” used by U.S.A. courts is a post-biblical, 16th–19th century Western construct that did not exist in Scripture or at the time of America’s founding.
  • The First Amendment was intended to protect the free exercise of the Christian faith and to keep the federal government out of the business of the church—not to provide constitutional protection for the worship of false gods, foreign ideologies, or the construction and display of idols.
  • All provisions and interpretations of the First Amendment must be read in light of America’s Christian heritage and founding documents, which recognized the supremacy of God and the necessity of Christian moral principles for ordered liberty. ---More...

  • Read Full Article...

    Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!

    The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.

    Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.

    Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.

    We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.

    Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.

    READ OUR Commenting Policy



    CFP Disqus Comments