Deferred Prosecutions--Are They Constitutional And How Far Will Government Take Them?
A DPA is unconstitutional and should be abolished because not every Canadian or American can participate and it becomes arbitrary law allowing only the rich and powerful (corporations) to pay for their own kind of justice
By Elizabeth Marshall —— Bio and Archives--November 18, 2019
Canadian News, Opinion | Comments | Back To Full Article
Thought of the day – Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPA) are they even constitutional? Seems they are not…And why would government need to hide the criteria of DPAs in an omnibus bill to amend the Criminal Code of Canada? Also, how far will the Canadian government take them – will they, like the Obama administration, allow for, as some put it, big corps to get away with “murder”?1Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy