• Elizabeth Marshall on Facebook
• Non-Partisan Advocate
• Director of Research Ontario Landowners Association
• Author – "Property Rights 101: An Introduction”
• Board Member/Secretary – Canadian Justice Review Board
• Legal Research – Green and Associates Law Offices, etc.,
• Legislative Researcher – MPs, MPPs, Municipal Councilors,
• President All Rights Research Ltd.,
I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice. Any information relayed is for informational purposes only. Please contact a lawyer.
For years, many of us have been attempting to ensure the laws Canadians deal with are fair; treat everyone equally and are not arbitrary. Meaning that when government enacts legislation there is a reasonable thought process and that the legislation, they are passing, meets the “constitutional” test.
Since the creation of ICLEI, it has been the main instrument used, by the UN and indirectly China, to bring the UN purported Sustainable Development Goals to the various Nations – World-wide.[1] A brief history may assist. In the early 1990’s the United Nations decided to expand on its mandate and, to some, this entity has created an over-arching mandate of interfering in the world’s sovereign Nations. This mandate consists of encouraging various Nations, non-profit organizations, non-governmental organizations, some post-secondary institutions, municipalities, etc., to bring forward unsustainable platforms, to the detriment of various citizens.
At the same time as the UN was beginning to give birth to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), ICLEI was also being brought forward. From ICLEI’s web-site, a brief history of ICLEI.
And as of July 2022, yet another representative, from China, continues in the role as the UN Secretary-General Appoints Li Junhua of China Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs.[2] This trend will only continue.
Included below are some of the contradictions in the UN SDGs.
The UN 17 SDGs have 169 “key targets”[1] which include some very laudable statements. That said, these statements are contradicted by other statements. For example, section 1.4 of the SDGs lays out:
“1.4 By 2030, ensure that all men and women, in particular the poor and the vulnerable, have equal rights to economic resources, as well as access to basic services, ownership and control over land and other forms of property, inheritance, natural resources, appropriate new technology and financial services, including microfinance.”[2]
In the early 1990’s the United Nations decided to expand on its mandate and, to some, this entity has created an over-arching mandate of interfering in the world’s sovereign Nations. This mandate consists of encouraging various Nations, non-profit organizations, non-governmental organizations, some post-secondary institutions, etc., to bring forward unsustainable platforms, to the detriment of various citizens.
In 2018 Prof. Jean-Paul Marechel[1] authored a report titled “What Role for China in the International Climate Regime”?[2] This report is succinct and brings forward an explanation as to why China got involved in “climate change.” According to Prof. Marechel’s report:
Over the past few days some have asked that I break down the report I had done to make it easier to relay information to their elected municipal officials. It seems, some officials have difficulty with time and have expressed that there are so many reports, from staff, that must be read, that it is difficult to read so many pages. So, the breakdown…
Ah the internet…what wonders have been achieved through this amazing medium? We’ve seen everything from searching for news articles to government legislation and policies, but over the years we’ve also found that there is an ongoing struggle to protect each individual’s information. There’s also been an ongoing struggle to protect our national security. WOW aren't the Western Democracies naïve…?
Someone expressed that with the extensive work by the UN, ICLEI, China, etc., in our schools and for the past 2-3 generations, it might be impossible to rid Canada of this promotion.
I, personally, don’t think so. Do Canadians actually want their liberties removed, their right to vote for more than 1 party, to seek redress in lawful court (yes I know there will be some who push back on that), etc. I don’t believe Canadians want China’s or other nefarious actors undermining our rights and I don’t think the youth of Canada – if they know and understand the facts, want that either.
The below statement is from the book “Why They Behave Like Russians.”
This lays out the communist doctrine that the educational system is to be used for propaganda. This is to ensure our children are educated to support the regime’s ideology. It would seem the United Nations is perpetrating the communist procedure regarding the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Could this be due to China’s direction to the UN? One should be very concerned as these are our children being indoctrinated at the behest of China, through the UN.
Perhaps Canadians have forgotten, or perhaps they don’t realize how short of time we have, but the statement by Prime Minister Trudeau, in 2013, seems to have some relevance with this government.
A reminder--Prime Minister Trudeau was chastised for his “… level of admiration I actually have for China because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to “…go green … we need to start investing in solar.’”[1]
Having taken time to read over the Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Deal (CUFTA), it seems, this deal is not a very good deal for anyone – Canadians or Ukrainians. Not only does this agreement seem an attempt to bind future Canadian governments, it also seems to violate provincial jurisdiction.
For decades the world has been very happy that the purported “cold wars” seemed to be over. The world had enjoyed a certain amount of peace. We all went to sleep, at night, thinking that our leaders were paying attention to global affairs. No one wanted to revert back to the days of deep distrust and the fear of war. It would seem it wasn’t only the fat and happy people, living in the Western democratic nations, who were sleeping – it was also the majority of the leaders, of these countries, as well.
Over the past few weeks, Canadians have been hearing more and more about Bill C-234 – “An Act to amend the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act,” in favour of allowing a “carve out” for the farming community.
There has been much debate on this issue and it’s even gone so far as to have Minister of the Environment, Steven Guilbeault, speaking with Senators to try and stop the Senate from passing the carbon tax exemption for farmers, from being enacted.
Thought of the Day - As Canadians grapple with dire financial times and the thought of China interfering with the 2019 and 2021 elections, could there be a connection behind our failing economy? This may be something that all Canadians should be asking, shouldn’t it?
In 2013 the then Liberal Leader, our Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, was quoted as saying:
“There’s a level of admiration I actually have for China because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime and say, ‘We need to go green … we need to start investing in solar.’”[1]
Being non-partisan and having watched the political theater in the Press, the House of Commons and Committee, one has to question what is happening with our government, doesn’t one?
When one thinks that the Prime Minister of Canada has made the statement of “To be quite honest, I know that no matter what I say, Canadians continue to have questions about what we did and what we didn't," Canada has a systemic problem.
If Canadians have this question(s), could that be a sign that all trust, in this government, is gone and is this tied into the many other violations, which have plagued this government, for almost a decade?
Over the past few weeks many Canadians have been watching the Inquiry on the use of the Emergencies Act, to remove the trucks from Ottawa, and the various border crossings.
What Canadians should have concern, regarding this use of this Act, is the laissez-faire attitude with which it was implemented. If the government feels that the events, which were taking place in Ottawa, etc., warranted War-time measures, this philosophy/standard can be used at any time against any Canadians. All Canadians should be thinking about that.
The other issue is, had these measures been used during the September 11, 2001 attacks, and weren’t – the bar had been set. We did not use our War Measures section of the Emergencies Act during these events. And yet, 9/11 was the first time NATO had used Article 5. We must, also, not forget the FLQ/October Crisis.
That is for you and your elected officials to decide…
Look at the photos, in the article provided from CTV, and think…the United Nations has all of the might of the entire world in its bowels and yet all it seems to do is spew off about the need to end fossil fuel use by the citizens of this world. With the announcement, yesterday, from the UN [1] it’s time for the UN to be dissolved, as it seems more concerned with freezing people; allowing people to die; allowing large war machines to invade and destroy smaller countries; and allowing continued war crimes.
Unknown to many Canadians the Federal government has brought forward Bill C-2 “An Act to provide further support in response to COVID-19.” By the title of this Bill, one may be of the opinion that this Bill will assist Canadians whereas nothing could be further from the truth.
Buried in this Bill are some extremely draconian aspects which interfere with provincial jurisdiction and make life in Canada unsustainable. One aspect of this Bill is the statement that the Governor General (G.G.) may designate “lockdown regions.” This involves recommendations from the Minister of Health and/or the Minister of finance.
Well, it was announced, yesterday, that it is suspected that Justin Trudeau will visit the Governor General on Sunday and ask that she prorogue Parliament to lead us into a 36-day election.
It would seem the propaganda Ads are already hitting the TV with how the Liberal government is saving Canadians from “gun violence.” They even had the audacity to have a camera shot of someone who looked like a rancher leaning on a wood fence with a cow-boy hat on.