Flaws in liberal "logic" regarding the budget

One unremarkable guest (didn't get his name, in any case) appearing on the Intelligence Report on FBN emphatically asked how poor people are served if the budget is cut that goes to the very people who provide the services? What he didn't understand is that the budget allocated to administrators only fuels administration. For the most part, a minor percentage makes it into the pockets of those meant to be helped and certainly doesn't further the goal of assisting them to no longer need services. My mistake, that's not the goal of government these days, is it? The goal, which is so evident by the Left's banshee cries about a budget that halts the egotistic growth of administration, is to proliferate bureaucracies--generally because that is Congress' definition of job creation and maintenance. Employment in the private sector (which is what government programs should be encouraging) gets poor people to the point of self-sufficiency; administration of entitlements and benefits, to be PC about it, keeps poor people in bondage to the services that serve them poorly.