Iran Agreement requires Advice and Consent
The Review Act was invalid before it was ever signed by the president due to its content and purpose to void the Constitution's superior voice
By A. Dru Kristenev —— Bio and Archives--August 9, 2015
American Politics, News | Comments | Back To Full Article
What is being offered here is a take that some will say is not possible. However, considering that Congress carries more power than the executive branch it seems that the Senate should be dealing with substance instead of presidential semantics.
When grilled by the Congressional committee, Secretary of State John Kerry was asked why this pact with Iran was not identified as a treaty. He answered that a treaty would never be approved by the Senate. The point is that Kerry essentially conceded that the agreement was in substance a treaty, which brings about the purpose of this opinion.
Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy