LGBTQ Curriculum Presents “Hostile” Viewpoint to Religious Beliefs
Forcing children into offensive instruction that is antithetical and hostile to their parents’ religious beliefs is unconstitutional
By Liberty Counsel —— Bio and Archives--June 27, 2025
American Politics, News | Comments | Back To Full Article
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Supreme Court has sided 6-3 with Maryland parents in Mahmoud v. Taylor ruling that a school board policy compelling children into LGBTQ-themed instruction without giving parents a choice to opt-out violates the First Amendment. Justice Samuel Alito, who wrote the majority’s opinion, declared that the religious parents in the case are entitled to a preliminary injunction that blocks the policy because the LGBTQ instruction “undermines” the religious beliefs and practices that they “wish to instill” in their children.
Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy