By Steve Rossiter —— Bio and Archives--April 17, 2023
Global Warming-Energy-Environment | Comments | Back To Full Article
In the April 4, 2023 print edition of The Epoch Times there is a wonderful article regarding the history of climate change and climate change predictions, or hoaxes, over the last century. Climate Predictions This article cited 42 of the nearly 100 failed predictions since 1923 in some detail.
Climate Change: To be clear, I am not a climate change denier. Climate change has been happening on the earth from the time God created the sun and then added air and water to the surface of the earth. The air and the water react to the heat from the sun and this results in weather, climate, and climate change. It is as simple as that. Climate change existed long before God got around to creating man and there is nothing man can do to influence weather or climate in the long term. Long term for this purpose is more than a few years. Even if man engaged in a nuclear holocaust, the resulting nuclear winter’s impact on climate and weather would likely last less than a decade.
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy
By Richard Greene on 2023 04 18
Speaking for those of us who have worked to refute climate change scaremongering for decades:
Please do us a big favor and never again write about the subject of climate science. You do not know the basics, misinform people, give conservatives a bad reputation, contradict 99.9% of the "skeptic" scientists in the world, and contradict 100% of the consensus scientists in the world. Ed Berry is a science fraud who has no idea what he is talking about. I'm sorry to say you are in the same category.
If you take the time to learn the difference between AGW and CAGW. and the difference between CMIP6 ECS with RCP8.6, versus CMIP6 TCS with RCP4.5, you may have reached the point of having some climate science knowledge.
I will help you get started:
Climate change refers to CAGW, not AGW
AGW is based on decent science, and it is not a hoax.
CAGW is just a data free prediction of climate doom
There has been no global warming since 2014, based on UAH satellite data, but there was significant warming from 1975 to 2014, and global cooling from 1940 to 1975. All three trends were accompanied by rising CO2 levels, which leads to an important conclusion. I'll leave that up to you to determine.
Science fraud Ed Berry claims only 3% to 5% of the current 420ppm atmospheric CO2 is from manmade CO2 emissions. The correct number is about 33%. In my 25 years of climate science reading, Ed Berry and the late Murray Salby were the two "scientists" who made that false claim. ... And my reading consists of almost entirely "skeptic" scientists and authors, NOT consensus scientists and authors.
Did you know that 5000 to 9000 years ago the climate was believed to be at least one degree C. warmer than today? That period was called the Holocene Climate Optimum, with optimum meaning good news. The IPCC agrees with this.
But today, the IPCC is claiming a rise of one degree C. temperature increase in the future, back to the level of 5000 to 9000 years ago, would NOT be another climate optimum. One degree C. warmer in the future would be a climate emergency, claims the IPCC.
The IPCC contradicts themselves.
Support Canada Free Press
