SCOTUS Delivers Huge Win for J6 Charges
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act has nothing to do with the events of January 6 and this new narrow interpretation will make it difficult for these indictments to stand
By Liberty Counsel —— Bio and Archives--June 28, 2024
American Politics, News | Comments | Back To Full Article
WASHINGTON D.C. – Today, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Fischer v. United States that the U.S. government interpreted an evidence destruction law too broadly in charging January 6 defendants with a felony obstruction charge for entering the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. The High Court’s decision sends the case back to the D.C. Court of Appeals to assess whether indictments can still stand under the narrower interpretation of the law. Liberty Counsel filed an amicus brief in this case because of the significant First Amendment implications.
Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy