SCOTUS Rules Censorship Challengers Lack Standing
Censoring viewpoints is a direct affront to free speech and offensive to the First Amendment. Once standing can be established, this government censorship of social media will end
By Liberty Counsel —— Bio and Archives--June 26, 2024
American Politics, News | Comments | Back To Full Article
WASHINGTON D.C. – Today, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Murthy v. Missouri that challengers alleging Biden administration officials “coerced” social media companies to remove content the government viewed as unfavorable did not have the legal right to sue and did not rule on the merits. The High Court determined neither the Louisiana and Missouri attorneys general nor the five private individuals who brought the lawsuit had standing to seek an injunction against any of the government defendants.
Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy