The Highlights of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Obama’s Executive Amnesty

This case underscores the importance of each branch of the federal government respecting the limits of its authority


By Elizabeth Slattery—— Bio and Archives--April 19, 2016

| Comments | Back To Full Article


The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case brought by Texas and 25 other states challenging the Obama administration’s attempt to give legal status and work authorizations to more than four million illegal immigrants. At the argument, the justices wrestled with whether the Obama administration exceeded its authority and whether the states have standing to sue. In 2012, the Obama administration created the Deferred Action of Childhood Arrivals program, enabling 1.7 million illegal aliens under 30 years old brought to the U.S. as children to apply for work authorization and deferred deportation. A deferred action is relief from deportation or removal proceedings granted by the Department of Homeland Security. More at the Heritage Foundation
Read Full Article...

Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!

The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.

Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.

Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.

We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.

Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.

READ OUR Commenting Policy



CFP Disqus Comments