The Highlights of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Obama’s Executive Amnesty
This case underscores the importance of each branch of the federal government respecting the limits of its authority
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case brought by Texas and 25 other states challenging the Obama administration’s attempt to give legal status and work authorizations to more than four million illegal immigrants.
At the argument, the justices wrestled with whether the Obama administration exceeded its authority and whether the states have standing to sue.
In 2012, the Obama administration created the Deferred Action of Childhood Arrivals program, enabling 1.7 million illegal aliens under 30 years old brought to the U.S. as children to apply for work authorization and deferred deportation. A deferred action is relief from deportation or removal proceedings granted by the Department of Homeland Security.
More at the Heritage Foundation
View Comments
Heritage Foundation——
Bio and Archives
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with more than 453,000 individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, mission is
to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.