WhatFinger


Perhaps that is what the UN is attempting to do – create anarchy and create discrimination, after all doesn’t that lead to their own UN “job creation” security, when one considers the original mandate of the UN – to stop conflict and discrimination?

Are the blockades, across Canada, based on the involvement of the United Nations?



Are the blockades, across Canada, based on the involvement of the United Nations?Thought of the Day – Are the blockades, across Canada, based on the involvement of the United Nations which has created discrimination and situations of conflict/anarchy amongst its member states? It would seem - “YES”. When there are two sets of laws, in one Nation, there is discrimination and there is anarchy. Perhaps that is what the UN is attempting to do – create anarchy and create discrimination, after all doesn’t that lead to their own UN “job creation” security, when one considers the original mandate of the UN – to stop conflict and discrimination?
In 1947-48, the United Nations presented to the world its Declaration of Human Rights. In that document it states:
“Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people, 
“Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,…”

And if one continues to read, through this Declaration of Human Rights (DHR), one will see that this document is quasi based on Magna Carta – which by the way is the very “colonial” law that has guaranteed the rights of humans, for centuries. As proof, Article 9 of the UN DHR states:
“Article 9 
“No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.”

Magna Carta, 1215 states:
“39. No freemen shall be taken or imprisoned or disseised or exiled or in any way destroyed, nor will we go upon him nor send upon him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.
40. To no one will we sell, to no one will we refuse or delay, right or justice.”

Support Canada Free Press


Therefore, the very protections the UN had already declared are actually part of colonial law – the very law which, now it seems, the UN is attempting to undermine. In 2007, the UN created the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples – UNDRIP. In that document is the complete breach of the official mandate of the UN Charter ratified in 1945. The UN Charter was created to stop conflict. It states:
“Article 1
 The Purposes of the United Nations are:

  1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;

  2. To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;

  3. To achieve international cooperation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion;…
Article 2
7. Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures...”

To continue:
“CHAPTER IX 
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COOPERATION
 Article 55
 With a view to the creation of conditions of stability and well-being which are necessary for peaceful and friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, the United Nations shall promote: …
c. universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for
all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion.”
And isn’t the UN DRIP document in complete contradiction to the UN Charter? It would seem so, as it creates discrimination and affords different rights to different people within the various Nation States.


Under the UNDRIP it states:
“Article 5
 Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their distinct political, legal, economic, social and cultural institutions, while retaining their right to participate fully, if they so choose, in the political, economic, social and cultural life of the State.
 Article 10 
Indigenous peoples shall not be forcibly removed from their lands or territories. No relocation shall take place without the free, prior and informed consent of the indigenous peoples concerned and after agreement on just and fair compensation and, where possible, with the option of return.
 (MY NOTE: Hasn’t this already been done by means of the various treaties already in existence and/or common law? See link to Treaties below) 
Article 19
 States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with the indigenous peoples concerned through their own representative institutions in order to obtain their free, prior and informed consent before adopting and implementing legislative or ad-ministrative measures that may affect them.”
And yet there are contradictions in the same document (UNDRIP), i.e., it states:

“Annex
 United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
The General Assembly,
 Recognizing also the urgent need to respect and promote the rights of indigenous peoples affirmed in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements with States,
 …
Article 27
States shall establish and implement, in conjunction with indigenous peoples concerned, a fair, independent, impartial, open and transparent process, giving due recognition to indigenous peoples’ laws, traditions, customs and land tenure systems, to recognize and adjudicate the rights of indigenous peoples pertaining to their lands, territories and resources, including those which were traditionally owned or otherwise occupied or used. Indigenous peoples shall have the right to participate in this process.”
With said Treaties already in place, it seems Article 27 contradicts, as it expresses “lands… traditionally owned or otherwise occupied or used.” This statement is ambiguous at the least – misleading at the worst – and this is what the descendants of some of the “historical people” are attempting to use, to violate Canadian law and the Treaties already established. 
INDIAN TREATIES AND SURRENDERS, FROM 1680 TO 1890.  Are the blockades, across Canada, based on the involvement of the United Nations which has created discrimination and situations of conflict/anarchy amongst its member states? It would seem - “YES”. 
When there are two sets of laws, in one Nation, there is discrimination and there is anarchy. Perhaps that is what the UN is attempting to do – create anarchy and create discrimination, after all doesn’t that lead to their own UN “job creation” security, when one considers the original mandate of the UN – to stop conflict and discrimination?


View Comments

Elizabeth Marshall -- Bio and Archives

Elizabeth Marshall on Facebook
• Non-Partisan Advocate
• Director of Research Ontario Landowners Association
• Author – “Property Rights 101:  An Introduction
• Board Member/Secretary – Canadian Justice Review Board
• Legal Research – Green and Associates Law Offices, etc.,
• Legislative Researcher – MPs, MPPs, Municipal Councilors,
• President All Rights Research Ltd.,

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.  Any information relayed is for informational purposes only.  Please contact a lawyer.


Sponsored