WhatFinger

When is a "vaccine" not a vaccine?  When it's the Jab

Doing Due Diligence



Doing Due DiligenceI believe that it is time for us to brush up on our knowledge regarding Klaus Schwab and transhumanism…the sooner the better.  Drat, first sentence in my new article and I'm already off topic.  This article is not about either Schwab or transhumanism – although both are well worth researching.  This article is about the infamous Jab. When is a "vaccine" not a vaccine?  When it's the Jab.  The Powers That Be have been playing word games with us – perverting terminology for who knows what ends.  The word "vaccine" has a rather innocuous connotation – everyone knows what a vaccine is – "computer modeled experimental gene therapy" not so much.

Big Pharma has surrounded the Jab with so many impenetrable layers of obfuscation, misdirection gobbledygook

The bottom line is, the Jab is not a vaccine.  The topic has been written about and discussed ad nauseum, so I will leave it at that.  If you don't yet grasp that the "vaccine" is not a vaccine by this point, then you probably never will grasp it.  In which case, bon voyage.   For those of you still with me; know that I have thoroughly researched the Jab, and have explored so many rabbit holes I feel entitled to some sort of spelunking award.  Big Pharma has surrounded the Jab with so many impenetrable layers of obfuscation, misdirection, and gobbledygook, it makes the notion of "informed consent" an exercise in quaint naiveté.  Informed consent?  How cute.

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential

This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.-- The Nuremberg Code (PDF)

I find the possible/probable inclusion of graphene oxide in the Jab particularly alarming

The Nuremberg Code precludes mandatory vaccines of any sort.  As I recall, a number of Nazi doctors who had trampled on the ethics of their profession, were hung after WW II.  Let us hope that the current host of "I vas just following orders" medical professionals do not meet a similar fate.  On second thought…. As someone who holds to the old saw caveat emptor (buyer beware) my bulls—t detector has been going off like crazy for some time now.  So much of what surrounds the so called "pandemic" makes no sense to me whatsoever…or rather, what makes sense to me doesn't jive with the official narrative that has been fed to us.  But I'm getting off topic again.  It is the misdirection, obfuscation, and confusion surrounding the Jab that I find the most alarming aspect of the whole scenario. I find the possible/probable inclusion of graphene oxide in the Jab particularly alarming.  I first became aware of graphene oxide with the publication of a report by the Spanish group La Quinta Columna (The Fifth Column).  An interview by Stew Peters with Dr. Jane Ruby also caught my attention.
Reason and truth are on our side. Anyone who contradicts this information about the vial, let him explain to you why the arm is magnetic. Even if he tells you: "It does not exist, " then let him tell millions of people who [experience] it. So, we have reason and truth on our side and we want very much that we and the people of the generations to come are not magnetically marked cattle, controlled from a distance and made sick because of that control. We have a challenge. Never has humanity had such an important challenge and we have to fight the battle. -- Dr. José Luis Sevillano  "Rights and Freedoms"

Support Canada Free Press

Donate

Stew Peters recently interviewed former Pfizer employee Karen Kingston

Stew Peters recently interviewed former Pfizer employee Karen Kingston.  Below is a snippet from that interview.  I apologize in advance for any mistakes I may have made while transcribing it.  I have lightly edited the conversation in order to smooth out narrative flow and strengthen topical cohesion.  I recommend that you view the video of the interview in order to understand the subject matter in greater depth than I can provide in print.
Karen Kingston: I looked for graphene oxide in the patent.  It is not listed in the patent because it is a trade secret.   Stew Peters: Why would they put every other ingredient on the patent with the exception of the standalone graphene oxide?  Why would they not put that on there?  Karen Kingston: I would say that the number one reason is because it's poisonous to humans, and well known to be poisonous to humans.  The other reason is because it is the main ingredient in hydrogel, which is the liquid AI template used… in creating an interface between humans and the… internet, if you will. Stew Peters: Why would people like President Trump, Ron DeSantis, Sean Hannity…how do they not know this stuff? Karen Kingston: There's no way they could know this stuff.  I want to be…sorry, when I found out…when I read this information…I didn't know that a woman could cry as hard as I cried.

Doctors were threatened with having their licenses taken away

I sent an email out on May 26 to about thirty outlets with this information.  I sent an email summarizing that "these are bioweapons."  ...The cognitive dissonance of the depravity and evil of these, of these…injections, is very difficult for anyone to understand, and you have to also understand that for the whole year-and-a-half that these ["vaccines"] were being developed, anyone who came out and said "Hey this virus isn't that bad" – they were mocked, they were ridiculed, they were ostracized. Doctors were threatened with having their licenses taken away.  So, the truth couldn't get out there.  No one in good conscience should have approved [these "vaccines"], but there was such brainwashing going on, such control of what Big Tech wanted us to know as "the truth," which was a bunch of lies.  It is very difficult then when someone tells you "This is what's going on" to believe it.  You are not going to believe it.   All of your trusted advisors have been telling you this stuff is safe.  Everyone in the media tells you that it is safe…and then someone says "No, it's actually lethal, and this is a planned genocide" – it's impossible to believe.  Does that make sense. Stew Peters: Doing what I do – downloading into my brain terabytes of information every single day, trying to determine what's real, what's not, what's missing, what's disinformation, who's Deep State, who's trying to throw me off, who's controlled opposition….  I mean…I'm just trying to process all this as you're saying it…I think of everyone who going to be mandated to get these shots…and the DOJ is telling people that they can do this, that governors can mandate this, that businesses can mandate this…. Karen Kingston: Just because someone says something, especially in this current administration, doesn't make it true.  The DOJ can say that they mandate these "vaccines," but their interpretation is reckless, and it has no merit.  So, it's just an opinion, it is not enforceable.  

Subscribe

I am "vaccine hesitant" to the same degree that I am "arsenic hesitant."  I am not anti-vaccine, but I am anti-Jab

An article on the "Freedom of Speech" website, written by an author who goes by the pseudonym "FOS-SA," states that some of the main takeaways from the Peters/Kingston interview are (and I quote):
  • All of the COVID-19 "vaccines" are bioweapons.
  • The graphene oxide in the vaccines is neutrally charged (inactive), however if/when it becomes positively charged, such as by electromagnetic radiation (radio frequency, such as wireless devices, wireless networks such as 5G, etc.), it will annihilate anything it comes into contact with and therefore can cause great damage and death depending on how much of it exists in the body and where it is located.
  • Multiple COVID-19 "vaccines" and booster shots may increase the amount of graphene oxide in the body.
  • The COVID-19 vaccine study should have been stopped when, during a study with mice, 80% died within 24 hours and the remainder died within the next few days.
Between descriptions of graphene oxide such as these, and reports of excessive blood clotting and other adverse effects, I am "vaccine hesitant" to the same degree that I am "arsenic hesitant."  I am not anti-vaccine, but I am anti-Jab. But that's just me.  If someone else wishes to get "vaccinated," then by all means jab away.  I use the term "due diligence" in the sense of engaging in research and analysis of a topic before committing to any particular action.  There is a plethora of information on the internet regarding the Jab – some good, some bad.  For my money one of the more erudite, sane, and informative examples is a video discussion between Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Dr. David Martin.  You might want to check it out if you haven't already. 
Dr. Martin: This my friends is the definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering, and collusion.  This is not a theory, this is evidenceDr. Fuellmich:  This could well blow up into a RICO case ultimately. Dr. Martin:  It is a RICO case, not it could blow up into one.  It is a RICO case.  …It's going to get worse here. Dr. Fuellmich:  It can't get worse. Dr. Martin:  Oh, it does.
                                  If you should choose to be injected with one of these sketchy nostrums then that's your choice…but I strongly suggest that you do your due diligence before proceeding with something you may later come to regret.  I also suggest praying for guidance.  Caveat emptor.

View Comments

Jim ONeill——

Born June 4, 1951 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Served in the U.S. Navy from 1970-1974 in both UDT-21 (Underwater Demolition Team) and SEAL Team Two.  Worked as a commercial diver in the waters off of Scotland, India, and the United States.  Worked overseas in the Merchant Marines.  While attending the University of South Florida as a journalism student in 1998 was presented with the “Carol Burnett/University of Hawaii AEJMC Research in Journalism Ethics Award,” 1st place undergraduate division.  (The annual contest was set up by Carol Burnett with money she won from successfully suing a national newspaper for libel).  Awarded US Army, US Navy, South African, and Russian jump wings.  Graduate of NOLS (National Outdoor Leadership School, 1970).  Member of Mensa, China Post #1, and lifetime member of the NRA and UDT/SEAL Association.


Sponsored