The Return of the British Empire--Perfidious Albion

"The Empire Strikes Back" is the second of the original Star Wars trilogy. In the first episode of the trilogy, the Empire suffered a setback in their war with the alliance, and now they were coming back stronger than ever. So too with the British Empire, and it is coming back with a vengeance, not overtly, but with subterfuge^[1].

The Prisoner Series: 

1. A look at Community versus the Collective based in the television series "The Prisoner"
2. The Contrast between Community and the Collective
3. The Return of the British Empire--Perfidious Albion

So far in Parts 1 and 2, we have looked at what is happening. In this part, I want to address the forces that are causing the maelstrom around us. Why are governments destroying the lives of the people they are supposed to serve?

Their ultimate goal is a return to the Old World Order, pre-Magna Carta, of rule by fiat, with neo-feudalism and neo-colonialism

Why, when the war in Ukraine looked like it was ending, did Boris Johnson, then Prime Minister of Britain. urge Zelenskyy to continue on, implying that England would back him? Why did the war in Ukraine start in the first place? Vladimir Putin did not start it; he was ending it. Why did H.G. Wells, a couple of months into World War I, call it the “War that will end war”?

One explanation is that it is all planned and happening for the benefit of the richest families in the world. These are the royal heads of state in Europe, particularly the King of England.

Fueled by the doctrine of the “Divine Right of Kings”, they believe that they are divinely appointed to rule the world; that there are only two kinds of people in the world: the ruling elite and peasants. The United Nations seems to be acting as the administrative tool of their divine right to rule over “the colonies”, to strip them of their resources for their enrichment. Their ultimate goal is a return to the Old World Order, pre-Magna Carta, of rule by fiat, with neo-feudalism and neo-colonialism.

They hate their limited power. They hate the middle class as that social class should not exist. Those people should be peasants subservient to the King. They hate being bound by the rule of law, preferring to rule by fiat, imposing arbitrary law. They especially despise Christianity as it promotes in people a desire to be free and not under the thumb of the King, but rather living in the service to the King of Kings.

To show how disconnected these people are, Prince Charles once quipped about the loss of the peat fueled hovels, that they were so picturesque. If he liked it so much, why did he not choose to live like that instead of inside the palace, waited on hand and foot?

Politicians are not beholden to the people who vote for them, they are beholden to the people who fund their campaigns

This form of rule is not what God had intended. When the Israelites wanted a king, God warned the people, through the prophet Samuel, to be careful what they asked for (1 Samuel 8:11-18). He said that he would take of the people, and he would not serve the people. In contrast, C.S. Lewis in “The Horse and His Boy”^[2] gave the description of a godly king.

“For this is what it means to be a king: to be first in every desperate attack and last in every desperate retreat, and when there’s hunger in the land (as must be now and then in bad years) to wear finer clothes and laugh louder over a scantier meal than any man in your land.”

This hardly describes the members of the Royal households, or even the politicians governing our lands who are leading lavish lifestyles. It is odd that Bernie Sanders, an avowed Socialist, is worth $2-3M and owns three homes without working a day in his life except in politics, all this on an annual salary of $180k. Nancy Pelosi is worth about $250M. One wonders how these people could accumulate so much wealth.

Today, politicians do not seem to care about their constituents. That is because they are not beholden to them. Political campaigns today are very costly and politicians need to raise a lot of funds to pay for them. They not beholden to the people who vote for them, they are beholden to the people who fund their campaigns--the donor class.

Upon the death of Queen Elizabeth of England, the following article appeared, “The Queen is Dead, but Liberty, Freedom and the Great Awakening are Alive”^[3]. It included an illustration called the “Pyramid of Enslavement” which is a picture of the hierarchy, a Pyramid of Power. At the top sits the Queen (sic King) of England. Below is the Council of 13, rich bankers and industrialists. Below that is the Committee of Three Hundred, the elite. Then there are various layers of control until it gets to the bottom, the great unwashed, we debt slaves. This is very much like life in the Village with prisoners (debt slaves) and control.

Central banking is the means by which England is rebuilding its empire

These people meet annually at conclaves like the Bilderberg group where they discuss the next step in their rebuilding of an Empire comprising peasants and colonials.

Central banking is the means by which England is rebuilding its empire. The banks present a no-win situation. They print the money that governments pump into the economy, but they only print the principle and not the interest. You can never pay off what you owe because there is not enough money to pay it off, so you go deeper into debt.

The IMF, the International Monetary Fund, is the means used to enslave the third world. They offer loans to farmers to sow crops. When a bad year occurs, they are then in a position to exact payment for the loans. Western agricultural technology is another tool as the GMO seeds are sterile and cannot be used as the basis for the next crop. Farmers are always having to go to companies like Monsanto for seed.

The elites’ main weapon against the common man is war^[4]. World War I was partly manufactured^[5]. It started when a young Serbian nationalist assassinated Archduke Ferdinand of Austria, the heir apparent to the throne. Austria declared war, but what should have remained a regional war was fanned into the global conflict we know today as World War I. There were many other underlying factors, such as munitions stockpiles, alliances and the like as well as national pride. But the war was kept going for four years until the elites thought the world would accept global government on their terms. This resulted in the League of Nations which quickly collapsed. After it fell, the elites worked towards a new world war, and following the war came the establishment of the United Nations, which is with us today. Also, the high cost of war makes it the means for the elites to impoverish the world while enriching themselves, giving rise to forever wars.

References

1. Elizabeth Farah, Susan Kokinda, “Why Trump Is Fighting a Century-old Global System”,  May 7, 2026.
2. CS Lewis, "The Horse and His Boy", Harper Collins, 1954.
3. Ellis Washington, The Queen is Dead, but Liberty, Freedom and the Great Awakening are Alive, The Ellis Washington Report, Oct 5, 2022.
4. Susan Kokinda, America at 250: The System Britain Stole and Trump is Taking Back, Canada Free Press, July 4, 2026.
5. Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War, The History Herald, July 29, 2013.