Republican from a swing district, the number-one contested seat in California, pulled off a major pro-freedom reform. Liberty is making a comeback in the USA, and in the most unlikely of places

A Conservative Miracle in Liberal California: The Passage of Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform

By —— Bio and Archives--August 26, 2016

American Politics, News, Opinion | Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

Nationally, the fight for liberty seems stalled, failed or in flight.

Donald Trump is struggling in the polls.

The Corrupt and Crooked Hillary looks poised to become the next President.

ISIS is running amok, and the embrace of Western Culture seems to have relaxed beyond return or restoration.

Yet even in the bluest of states—my native California—individual liberty is advancing.

Hard to believe? Read on!


Assemblyman David Hadley (R-Torrance—YES!) scored another legislative victory, and this win deserves promotion.

Last year, he worked with State Senator Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles) to shepherd SB 443 through the state legislature.

What is SB 443? Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform.

What’s civil asset forfeiture?

Most people aren’t aware, but police officers possess an undue amount of discretion. If they suspect someone of a crime, they can seize ample amounts of property, money, or wealth without obtaining a criminal conviction.

This is wrong, a brazen violation of the Fourth Amendment.

California’s state senate near-unanimously supported the legislation.

In the state assembly, it failed.

Only four Republicans voted for it, but the moderate, pro-business Democrats (?) voted against.

Hadley was really crushed about it at the end of the 2015 legislative session.

When I looked over possible reasons why the large majority of California Republican (and Democratic) Assemblymembers rejected the measure, I noticed that many of them stress a pro-law enforcement platform.

They also covet endorsements (and donations) from law enforcement agencies. too.

Whether anyone admits it or not, law enforcement have relied on civil asset forfeiture, in many cases for dubious reasons.

Originally, the idea was to shut down the funding for drug cartels, when proving actual crime proved elusive.

Now, police departments admit openly that they rely on the unconstitutional practice to pad their resources and expense accounts.

As Assemblyman Hadley had announced during a 2015 press conference: “I value our law enforcement too much for them to have to work on commission.”


The bill stalled but thankfully did not die.

Fast-forward to today.

SB 443 finally passed out of the state assembly with widespread bipartisan support.

What made it work this time?

Senator Holly Mitchell promoted SB 443 with a “Black Lives Matter” anti-law enforcement message. Such negativity would not sway Republicans to support SB 443. Hadley led the charge, stressing the limited government and pro-constitutional aspects of the bill.

A libertarian motive, or justification was needed, and Hadley provided for it.

As he had shared with me:

“It is the right thing to do.”

The bill that passed was a modified reform from 2015. With the new bill—soon to become law—the state cannot seize assets up to $40,000 without proving a crime.

Reason Magazine delineated the other added amendments and revisions:

The conviction requirement remains in this version of the bill, but a section has been added to allow police to seek seizure without a conviction if the defendant doesn’t show up for court, flees to evade prosecution, or is deceased.

Some conservatives bellyached, claiming that more wealthy property owners would fall victim to legalized theft.

I disagree. This reform is monumental.

A freshman Republican Assemblyman smoothed over resistance from colleagues on both sides of the aisle to pass a compromise which expands liberty while limiting the power of the state. He played offense to get this monumental reform through the state legislature in one of the bluest states in the union.

Hadley reported on the compromise:

I am proud to be the principal co-author of a significant bipartisan reform bill, SB 443, which passed the Assembly 69-7 on Monday. Los Angeles Senator Holly Mitchell - from across the aisle - is the bill’s lead author.

SB 443 reforms civil asset forfeiture, by which law enforcement can take a suspect’s cash and property without obtaining a conviction or even charging the suspect with a crime.

SB 443 is a well-structured compromise, the product of several months of serious work. It improves Constitutional protections for Americans while enabling law enforcement to retain an important tool as they combat drug trafficking and organized crime.

Back to the Senate for a concurring vote, and on to Governor Brown’s desk! SB 443 is a good example of how bipartisanship and hard work have yielded a great result!

Organized crime will still face stiff challenges to their operations, but innocent individual property owners will no longer have to endure legalized theft from rapacious police departments.

Despite its disturbing left-leaning agenda in the past, the American Civil Liberties Union is embracing more libertarian views, which appeal to conservatives.

ACLU SoCal praised the passage of SB 1146

SACRAMENTO—A California bill to limit civil asset forfeiture abuses was approved today by the State Assembly on a 66 to 8 vote. The bill will now return to the Senate for a concurrence vote.

Senate Bill 443, co-authored by Senator Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles) and Assemblymember David Hadley (R-Manhattan Beach), provides individuals with stronger property rights protections by requiring a conviction in most state civil asset forfeiture cases. The bill also addresses a problematic financial incentive that has driven some California law enforcement agencies to bypass state law in favor of federal law, opening the door to abuses.

“Today’s vote is a tremendous victory for fairness and justice,” said Margaret Dooley-Sammuli, criminal justice and drug policy director for the ACLU of California. “For years, the scales of justice were tipped in favor of profits and against the fundamental rights of countless Californians who were unfairly deprived of their life savings and property through civil forfeiture laws. Today, the Legislature got it right.”

This is the essence of “people before profits”, and a conservative reform to boot!

In California, the Democratic Party Dominance is riddled with cronyism and corruption, has created lawmakers who enrich themselves.

Nevertheless, a Republican from a swing district, the number-one contested seat in California, pulled off a major pro-freedom reform. Liberty is making a comeback in the USA, and in the most unlikely of places.

Here’s to more states embracing future reforms.


Only YOU can save CFP from Social Media Suppression. Tweet, Post, Forward, Subscribe or Bookmark us

Arthur Christopher Schaper -- Bio and Archives | Comments

Arthur Christopher Schaper is a teacher-turned-writer on topics both timeless and timely; political, cultural, and eternal. A life-long Southern California resident, Arthur currently lives in Torrance.



Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence and death, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.
-- Follow these instructions on registering: