Blatant Misrepresentation

As hundreds, if not thousands of people, know, David Holland had submitted an FOI request on May 27, 2008, only two days prior to the “delete any emails” request.

News on the Net

Global Warming-Energy-Environment | Comments | July 23, 2010

by Muir Russell Panel The Muir Russell panel blatantly misrepresented the facts surrounding Jones’ notorious request to “delete all emails”, a misrepresentation that, in my opinion, was done, at a minimum, either recklessly or out of gross negligence.

The Muir Russell Report

Muir Russell’s findings on the “delete any emails” incident are contained in chapter 10 paragraph 28. Obviously the issuing of an FOI request affects the right of Jones or anyone else to delete documents. Muir Russell purported to exonerate CRU on this count on the empirical basis that the “delete any emails” request had not occurred in the context of a prior FOI request – a claim that is totally untrue. There seems clear incitement to delete emails, although we have seen no evidence of any attempt to delete information in respect of a request already made. Two e-mails from Jones to Mann on 2nd February 2005 (1107454306.txt) and 29th May 2008 (in 1212063122.txt) relate to deletion: More...

Email Us | Reader Friendly | Comments

News on the Net——Bio and Archives

News from around the world