Make Mark Zuckerberg accountable to truth and to respect for the 1st Amendment


By —— Bio and Archives--April 8, 2018

Cover Story | Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

Mark Zuckerberg will never tell the truth, but it’s as plain as the nose on his face that Facebook didn’t dump popular Diamond and Silk because their “content and brand has been determined unsafe to the community”. Facebook turned D&S’s lights off because they are unabashedly pro-Trump—a high crime that’s been getting people, including kids beaten up and conservative news sites disappeared from the Public Square ever since Nov. 8, 2016.

If there’s anyone whose “content and brand is unsafe to the community”  it’s Mark Zuckerberg & Company who stole online information from billions of unknowing users and sold it for untold billions of dollars to advertisers making Facebook rich.


Diamond and Silk is anathema to the likes of Zuckerberg because its producers are truthful along with being bright, sassy and funny.  They bring levity and perspective to the Internet when Zuckerberg has already branded all those who use his platform as “dumb f**ks”.

The timing of Facebook dumping Diamond and Silk couldn’t possibly be more suspicious: two days after revelations that Zuckerberg’s personal messages to executives are being secretly wiped, and three days before his Tuesday testimony before a Congress heavily invested in his company.

Internet users are finding out that their inboxes aren’t their own any more but brutally vulnerable to the whims of Facebook.

…”The company admitted it has been removing executives’ messages from the inboxes of various people for several years - an option not currently available to its 2.2 billion other users.” (Independent, April 7, 2018)

Behold what sneaky Zuck has been up to when the media spotlight hasn’t been on him.

The popular, loved and not just Facebook ‘liked’ D&S—talented Lynnette Hardaway and Rochelle Richardson in real life—were dumped in an arrogant Facebook message Friday night.

In ridding the Internet of D&S was the in-the-tank-with-progressives Zuckerberg doing a favor for one of his political friends?

Was it for Barack Obama or was it for unhinged Obama protege Hillary Clinton?

Who else?!

“Diamond and Silk shot to fame after the Drudge Report linked to several of their videos and they made appearances with then-candidate Trump on the campaign trail.” (American Mirror, April 7, 2018)

“The pro-Trump pair posted on the embattled social media platform on Friday night, saying after months of correspondence, they were deemed to be “unsafe to the community.” (American Mirror)

“Diamond And Silk have been corresponding since September 7, 2017, with Facebook (owned by Mark Zuckerberg), about their bias censorship and discrimination against the D&S brand page,” they wrote.

“Finally after several emails, chats, phone calls, appeals, beating around the bush, lies, and giving us the run around, Facebook gave us another bogus reason why Millions of people who have liked and/or followed our page no longer receive notification and why our page, post and video reach was reduced by a very large percentage,” echoing the complaints of many conservative and pro-Trump pages.

“Here is the reply from Facebook. Thurs., Apr 5, 2018 at 3:40 PM: “The Policy team has came to the conclusion that your content and your brand has been determined unsafe to the community.”

“The pair say it took “6 Months, 29 days, 5 hrs, 40 minutes and 43 seconds” to get a response, which they add the network said is “final and it is not appeal-able in any way.”

D&S deserve full public support in getting Facebook and Zuckerberg to answer their questions.

“They posed several questions to Facebook and Zuckerberg, including, “What is unsafe about two Blk-women supporting the President Donald J. Trump?” (American Mirror)

“This is deliberate bias, censorship and discrimination. These tactics are unacceptable and we want answers!” they wrote.”

Meanwhile Congress will be wasting our time lobbing softballs at Zuckerberg, who like the wife beater, will metaphorically promise not to do it again on Tuesday.

For all of his excuses and alibis Zuckerberg is a prime team player for a current social media that’s determined to purge every vestige of the Conservative voice from the Internet.

The social media of the Brave New World will provide a voice to Barack Obama, who intends to be its leader from his Resistance Bunker.

The Information Highway no longer belongs to the average but belongs to Marxist millennials selling a bogus utopia to the unsuspecting masses.

As Canada Free Press (CFP)  scribe Mark Smith points out: “President Donald Trump should declare that Facebook is a defacto arm of the Democrat Party. Thus, Facebook is a political party.


“Since Facebook is a defacto arm of the Democrat Party, then no politicians’ ads should be legal to appear on Facebook for any sitting Senator or House member or those seeking those positions in government via an election campaign or through the influence to any of those election campaigns. 

“This should apply to both federal seats and state seats.

“Furthermore, since Facebook is a defacto front for the Democrat Party, ALL Facebook employees, contractors and former employees or contractors MUST be required to register as lobbyists within 30 days. Done and done.

“Also if any present or former Facebook employee has a relative who has a job working for any state or federal government, they also must declare those relationships.”

Congress is paid to recognize shysters on or off line.

Make Mark Zuckerberg accountable to truth and to respect for the 1st Amendment.



Only YOU can save CFP from Social Media Suppression. Tweet, Post, Forward, Subscribe or Bookmark us

Judi McLeod -- Bio and Archives | Comments

Copyright © Canada Free Press

RSS Feed for Judi McLeod
Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years’ experience in the print media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared on Rush Limbaugh, Newsmax.com, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com.

Older articles by Judi McLeod

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence and death, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.
-- Follow these instructions on registering: