Devil Enjoying Tempest-In-Teapot USCCB/Democrat Eucharist Tug of War

And if churches FINALLY open their doors to the faithful 100%, who will be coming back? The visibly grinning Prince of Darkness, sitting right there, front and center in the first row of dusty sanitized pews.


Devil Enjoying Tempest-In-Teapot USCCB/Democrat Eucharist Tug of WarOpen expressions of “Loving God” will soon be ‘Hate Speech’, loving God according to authorities, not being “inclusive” enough. It’s coming down the pike, courtesy of C-36. (Breitbart, June 24, 2021) Being caught in the category of “Loving God” will cost reported-on ‘offenders’ a possible $70,000 fine and potentially a one-year jail sentence.

While some 15 million Ontario residents are heaving a collective sigh of relief that they can, as of June 30, book a haircut after three months in Lockdown, their provincial and federal leaders are off on Summer Break, until late September. (House of Commons Sitting Calendar) From now until then all churches will be held under the same draconian Covid-19 restrictions, only with attendance going from 15% to 40% on July 21. Are government leaders coasting in to the Fall when seasonal influenza brings back pandemic scare mongering again? Most clerics remained stonily silent when churches became part of the pandemic Lockdown some 15 months ago. Meanwhile, the so-called ‘Battle of the Weaponization of the Holy Eucharist’ has reached the deep depths of the ‘Toldya’ category: ‘US bishops say they won’t issue ‘national policy’ on Communion for pro-abortion politicians’(LifesiteNews, June 24, 2021) ‘There will be no national policy on withholding Communion from politicians,’ the bishops’ conference clarified’.
WASHINGTON— As the dust settles after the U.S. bishops gathered online for their Spring Assembly last week, the bishops’ conference has released a brief clarifying note on the proposed document on the meaning of the Eucharist in the life of the Church, stating, “There will be no national policy on withholding Communion from politicians.” “The three-day conference, livestreamed online, was marked by debate and division on the matter of the Eucharistic document proposed by the Doctrine Committee of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). Proposing the document, Bishop Kevin Rhoades, head of the Doctrine Committee, stated that there was a need for a “unified and strong revival of the meaning of the Eucharist in the life of the Church,” which was “more critical now than ever.”


It’s only been there, rock solid, for more than 2,000 years before Democrat politics left it up for grabs. Back to the three-day USCCB conference:
“However, in the wake of strong protest from a number of cardinals and bishops, as well as from mainstream media reports and pro-abortion self-described Catholic politicians, Rhoades added that the purpose of the document was not to single out select groups of people, particularly pro-abortion politicians such as Joe Biden.” (LifeSiteNews)
Then what, pray tell, was the bishopric rabble-rousing all about then?
“It was never our thought to present national norms for denying Catholics Holy Communion,” stated Rhoades, who ruled out creating a “national policy.” Instead, he described the document’s purpose as seeking to “present a clear understanding of why the Church has these laws.” (LifeSiteNews) “The document, which was given the approval to be drafted, has piqued interest from Catholic and non-Catholic media alike, with the suspicion that despite avoiding singling out any particular group, it might nevertheless affirm teaching which would prohibit abortion supporters from receiving Holy Communion. “Such a thought was evidently on the minds of the virtually assembled clerics, as Cardinals Blaise Cupich, Joseph Tobin, and Wilton Gregory, as well as Bishop Robert McElroy, attacked the document, opposing any policy of denying the Eucharist to individuals, saying it would even be out of line with the Gospel.


Clarifying note rules out any national policy on Holy Communion

“Now, however, the USCCB has issued a one-page note in an apparent attempt to regain control of the media narrative, a concern which was even raised by certain bishops during the meeting. The note addresses certain key questions on the Eucharistic document, namely why it is being drafted, whether the USCCB voted to ban pro-abortion politicians from Holy Communion, if there will be a policy on such a question, and whether the move is in line with the Vatican.(LifeSiteNews) “The document notes that there was no vote or even debate on banning pro-abortion politicians, or indeed anyone, from Holy Communion. “Instead, the bishops wrote in the note: “Each Catholic — regardless of whether they hold public office or not — is called to continual conversion, and the U.S. bishops have repeatedly emphasized the obligation of all Catholics to support human life and dignity and other fundamental principles of Catholic moral and social teaching.” “Furthermore, the note clearly stipulates what Rhoades mentioned at the Spring Assembly: There will be no new national policy on the reception of the Eucharist in the Eucharistic document.” “Indeed, Rhoades himself already mentioned in comments to the press after the second day of the Spring Assembly that “I can’t answer” whether Biden would be allowed to receive Holy Communion. It would be a matter for Biden’s own bishop, Rhoades added.”


Eucharistic document, much ado about nothing? Church’s law already binds

“With regards to the upcoming Eucharistic document, it seems that in light of the June 21 note, the issue of giving Communion to supporters of abortion will not be covered, even though abortion is a grave sin, and one which instantly bars one from receiving Holy Communion — a significant issue in a discussion of the Eucharist and the Church.(LifeSiteNews) “The Catholic Church teaches that abortion is always wrong because it kills an innocent human being, thus violating the Church’s prohibition on murder, a teaching which “remains unchangeable.” “Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense,” reads the Catechism of the Catholic Church. “The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life.” “Any state which deprives a certain category of persons of their inalienable rights, particularly the right to life from conception until death, is thus “denying the equality of all before the law,” and undermines its own foundations.


"Furthermore, the Church’s Canon Law stipulates that under no circumstances are those who persist in manifest grave sin to receive the Holy Eucharist. “Those who have been excommunicated or interdicted after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion.”(LifeSiteNews) “In fact, while the USCCB attempt to avoid this topic by rejecting any national policy, the Church has already spoken for the bishops in a universal manner, through the official texts and laws which bind all Catholics, both clerical and lay.”
So what did the USCCB/60 letter-writing Democrats achieve in all the hullabaloo over receiving The Body of Christ in churches still closed or suppressed for Worship? Months long of virtue signalling by ‘Catholic’ Democrat politicians who are pro-abortion but still present themselves for Holy Communion anyway. And if churches FINALLY open their doors to the faithful 100%, who will be coming back? The visibly grinning Prince of Darkness, sitting right there, front and center in the first row of dusty sanitized pews.

View Comments

Judi McLeod—— -- Judi McLeod, Founder, Owner and Editor of Canada Free Press, is an award-winning journalist with more than 30 years’ experience in the print and online media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared throughout the ‘Net, including on Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.